Citation network
Lichter Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 14, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Lichter v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 334 U.S. 742 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Lichter v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 334 U.S. 742 (1948) Lichter v. UnitedSearch
-
the terms of the Renegotiation Act in a manner designed to eliminate excessive private profits. See United States v. BethlehemSearch
-
A. v. PournallSearch
-
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment. It followed its earlier decision in Spaulding v. DouglasSearch
-
Page 334 U. S. 769 On February 16, 1942, this Court, in United States v. BethlehemSearch
-
been forfeited. We find no reason for not reaching here the constitutionality of the Act. Cf. Aircraft & Diesel Corp. v. HirschSearch
-
Wade v. StimsonSearch
-
Macauley v. WatermanSearch
-
Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
excess income as applied by Congress to the railroads had been upheld by this Court in 1924. Dayton-Goose Creek R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 263 U. S. 456 . The opinions of this Court in Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 295 U. S. 495 , 295 U. S. 529 -542, and Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSearch
-
action of Congress came within the scope of its discretion as described by Chief Justice Hughes in Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSearch
-
Hampton Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
American Power & Light Co. v. SECSearch
-
Spaulding v. DouglasSearch
-
rates for sales of natural gas, Federal Power Comm'n v. HopeSearch
-
in establishing rules and regulations under the Federal Communications Act, National Broadcasting Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
of property, Sunshine Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
distinct from offenses defined under the common law, Federal Trade Comm'n v. KeppelSearch
-
rates for the services of commission men, Tagg Bros. & Morehead v. UnitedSearch
-
rent for premises, with final determination in the courts, Levy Leasing Co. v. SiegelSearch
-
U. S. 788 Transportation Act of 1920, 41 Stat. 488, has been sustained by this Court. Dayton-Goose Creek R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
in any of the cases before us, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, here, as in Aircraft & Diesel Corp. v. HirschSearch
-
Opp Cotton Mills v. AdministratorSearch
-
Together with No. 74, Pournall et al. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, on certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and No. 95, Alexander Wool Combing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
or compensation in connection with the negotiation of war contracts, approved July 14, 1943, c. 239, 57 Stat. 564, 565. v. TitleSearch
-
to the opinions of the Circuit Courts of Appeals and District Courts cited in the text, see Ring Construction Corp. v. SecretarySearch
-
Cohen v. SecretarySearch
-
Stein Bros. Mfg. Co. v. SecretarySearch
-
the Renegotiation Act by this Court, stopping short of passing upon its constitutionality, see Aircraft & Diesel Corp. v. HirschSearch
-
U. S. 752 , and Macauley v. WatermanSearch
-
United States v. BethlehemSearch
-
Burroughs v. PeytonSearch
-
McKinley v. UnitedSearch
-
Northern Pacific R. Co. v. NorthSearch
-
Hamilton v. KentuckySearch
-
Hirabayashi v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 503 (rent control), and Korematsu v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 323 U. S. 214 (exclusion of civilians from west coast military area). In Hirabayashi v. UnitedSearch
-
Billings v. UnitedSearch
-
Brushaber v. UnionSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lichter v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial