Citation network
United States Vs. Cio
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 106 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. CIOSearch
-
U.S. 106 (1948) United States v. CongressSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
upon such a contention on an appeal under the Criminal Appeals Act except in cases of logical necessity. United States v. PetrilloSearch
-
Cohen Grocery Co., 225 U. S. 81 , 225 U. S. 88 , 225 U. S. 97 . Compare United States v. CarboneSearch
-
This statute was the legislative Page 335 U. S. 114 response to the decision of this Court in Newberry v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 256 U. S. 232 . Cf. United States v. ClassicSearch
-
West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
U. S. 624 , and Thomas v. CollinsSearch
-
Fort Smith & W.R. Co. v. MillsSearch
-
United States v. GuarantySearch
-
Keifer & Keifer v. ReconstructionSearch
-
United States v. AmericanSearch
-
Boston Sand & Gravel Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Harrison v. NorthernSearch
-
United States v. DelawareSearch
-
to adopt that construction which will save the statute from constitutional infirmity. Knights Templars Indemnity Co. v. JarmanSearch
-
questions arise and by the other of which such questions are avoided, our duty is to adopt the latter. Harriman v. InterstateSearch
-
Federal Trade Commission v. AmericanSearch
-
Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. BooneSearch
-
Blodgett v. HoldenSearch
-
Mr. Justice Brandeis, concurring, in Ashwander v. TennesseeSearch
-
U. S. 288 , 297 U. S. 345 -346. See also, more recently, Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySearch
-
Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-DetroitSearch
-
United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSearch
-
Rescue Army v. MunicipalSearch
-
in passing upon the validity of an act of Congress. Ashwander v. TennesseeSearch
-
by the precise facts of the situation or the terms of the assailed legislation. See Liverpool, N.Y. & P. S.S. Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
see also Statement of the United States of America as Amicus Curiae in Burco, Inc. v. WhitworthSearch
-
Government's Brief in Landis v. NorthSearch
-
they do not come here in the setting of normal adjudications on the merits of a controversy. Compare United States v. PetrilloSearch
-
U. S. 1 , with the subsequent adjudication on the merits in United States v. PetrilloSearch
-
by not attributing an erroneous position to the Government. See, for instance, petition for rehearing in Morgan v. UnitedSearch
-
an allowable construction that fairly avoids a constitutional issue. See my dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
in abridgement of rights protected by the First Amendment, the government points to the case of United Public Workers v. MitchellSearch
-
the sponsor's steadfast view can have weight to determine the coverage of a statute indefinite in its terms, Wright v. VintonSearch
-
United States v. WrightwoodSearch
-
limits to those freedoms must be narrowly drawn to meet the precise evil the legislature seeks to curb, Cantwell v. ConnecticutSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial