Citation network
Macdougall Vs. Green
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 21, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 281 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court MacDougall v. GreenSearch
-
U.S. 281 (1948) MacDougall v. GreenSearch
-
the former. The Constitution -- a practical instrument of government -- makes no such demands on the States. Colegrove v. GreenSearch
-
U. S. 549 , and Colegrove v. BarrettSearch
-
affirmed. MR. JUSTICE RUTLEDGE. In its facts and legal issues, this case is closely analogous to Cologrove v. GreenSearch
-
been disfranchised by the application of the questioned Illinois procedures. Every reason existing in Colegrove v. GreenSearch
-
Accordingly, I express no opinion concerning the constitutional and other questions presented. As in Colegrove v. GreenSearch
-
general election, but also extends to every integral part of the electoral process, including primaries. United States v. ClassicSearch
-
either the primary or general election would lack that equality which the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees. See Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
if the same discrimination appears in the procedure prescribed for nominating petitions. See State ex rel. Ragan v. JunkinSearch
-
the Equal Protection Clause if this law were aimed at the Progressive Party in the manner that the state law in Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
in its operation. The test is whether it has some foundation in experience, practicality, or necessity. See Skinner v. OklahomaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of another group. This legislation therefore has the same inherent infirmity as that which some of us saw in Colegrove v. GreenSearch
-
government. Federal courts should be most hesitant to use the injunction in state elections. See Wilson v. NorthSearch
-
process might result, and the elective system that is vital to our government might be paralyzed. Cf. Johnson v. StevensonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court MacDougall v. GreenSearch
-
the States. Colegrove v. GreenSearch
-
and Colegrove v. BarrettSearch
-
Cologrove v. GreenSearch
-
Colegrove v. GreenSearch
-
See Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
Ragan v. JunkinSearch
-
See Skinner v. OklahomaSearch
-
See Wilson v. NorthSearch
-
Cf. Johnson v. StevensonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial