Citation network
Frazier Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 20, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Frazier v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 335 U.S. 497 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Frazier v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 335 U.S. 497 (1948) Frazier v. UnitedSearch
-
the mere fact of government employment is insufficient to disqualify a juror who is otherwise qualified. United States v. WoodSearch
-
I. The method of selecting the panel. -- Apart from the objection that this challenge came too late, cf. Agnew v. UnitedSearch
-
Glasser v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 315 U. S. 60 , 315 U. S. 87 . See also Smith v. MississippiSearch
-
Martin v. TexasSearch
-
Brownfield v. SouthSearch
-
Counsel then urged that this furnished basis for applying the decision in Thiel v. SouthernSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Finally, in this phase of the case, United States v. WoodSearch
-
a party. The disqualification had arisen in 1908 by virtue of the decision, made on common law grounds, in Crawford v. UnitedSearch
-
so. After accepting them before trial, he could not challenge them successfully in a motion for a new trial. Queen v. HepburnSearch
-
United States v. GaleSearch
-
U. S. 65 . See Kohl v. LehlbackSearch
-
Table v. PublishedSearch
-
I know Your Honor has read this case in the Supreme Court, Thiel v. SouthernSearch
-
and a fair trial. Stilson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 250 U. S. 583 , 250 U. S. 586 , quoted in United States v. WoodSearch
-
United States v. CottinghamSearch
-
United States v. McPhersonSearch
-
United States v. KrouseSearch
-
Pointer v. UnitedSearch
-
Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Ruthenberg v. UnitedSearch
-
Thomas v. TexasSearch
-
Higgins v. UnitedSearch
-
Fay v. NewSearch
-
Thiel v. SouthernSearch
-
Akins v. TexasSearch
-
See United States v. WoodSearch
-
juries including four and nine Government employees were not inherently defective. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. DistrictSearch
-
entirely of persons who were either employees or tenants of the Government was not improperly constituted. Schackow v. GovernmentSearch
-
In United States v. WoodSearch
-
would be condemned not only by reason of, but even without resort to the doctrine that prevailed in, Ballard v. UnitedSearch
-
Pacific Co., 328 U. S. 217 , and Glasser v. UnitedSearch
-
been any result so consistently and inevitably prejudicial to one of the litigants as here, under our noses. Ballard v. UnitedSearch
-
the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, there has been no such brazen unfairness in actual practice. Moore v. NewSearch
-
Fay v. NewSearch
-
York, 332 U. S. 261 . Page 335 U. S. 519 The precedent of United States v. WoodSearch
-
decision held only that the absolute disqualification of any federal employee, which had been declared in Crawford v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Frazier v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WoodSearch
-
Agnew v. UnitedSearch
-
Smith v. MississippiSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial