Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Steele Vs. General Mills, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 06, 1947

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 1 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Holmberg Vs. Armbrecht US Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1946
  2. Steele v. General
    Search
  3. Mills, Inc. - 329 U.S. 433 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court Steele v. General
    Search
  4. Mills, Inc., 329 U.S. 433 (1947) Steele v. General
    Search
  5. The Circuit Court of Appeals, one judge dissenting, reversed. General Mills v. Steele
    Search
  6. sitting in Texas erred in holding that no part of the claim was barred by Article 5526. See Texarkana & Ft. S. R. Co. v. Houston
    Search
  7. we shall leave undisturbed the interpretation placed upon purely local law by a Texas federal judge. MacGregor v. State
    Search
  8. Henderson Co. v. Thompson
    Search
  9. Thompson v. Consolidated
    Search
  10. of estoppel or pari delicto can be invoked to defeat payment of the full tariff rate. In Texas & N.O. R. Co. v. Yates
    Search
  11. essential respect the same as that of the Federal statutes which we had under consideration in Houston & T.C. R. Co. v. Johnson
    Search
  12. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  13. Comm'n, 138 S.W.2d 927, 930-931, rev'd on other grounds, 138 Tex. 148, 157 S.W.2d 622. Cf. Stephenson v. Binford
    Search
  14. not merely a private obligation between shippers and carriers. The duty to pay is a public one, Houston & T.C. R. Co. v. Johnson
    Search
  15. of pari delicto might be applied in Texas to some types of contracts so as to defeat recovery, see Wright v. Wight
    Search
  16. different from the rule we believe has been applicable in the state courts. Such a result cannot be approved. Holmberg v. Armbrecht
    Search
  17. Greer v. Railroad
    Search
  18. St. Louis, I.M. & S. R. Co. v. Landa
    Search
  19. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Uvalde
    Search
  20. Alpha Petroleum Co. v. Terrell
    Search
  21. Mingus v. Wadley
    Search
  22. Burford v. Sun
    Search
  23. United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Steele v. General
    Search
  25. General Mills v. Steele
    Search
  26. See Texarkana & Ft. S. R. Co. v. Houston
    Search
  27. MacGregor v. State
    Search
  28. In Texas & N.O. R. Co. v. Yates
    Search
  29. Houston & T.C. R. Co. v. Johnson
    Search
  30. Cf. Stephenson v. Binford
    Search
  31. Wright v. Wight
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales