Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

international Harvester Co. Vs. Evatt

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 06, 1947

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 7 linked 21 unlinked
Show
  1. Hope Natural Gas Co. Vs. Hall US Supreme Court · May 16, 1927
  2. Wallace Vs. Hines US Supreme Court · May 03, 1920
  3. Underwood Typewriter Co. Vs. Chamberlain US Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1920
  4. international Shoe Co. Vs. Shartel US Supreme Court · May 13, 1929
  5. Western Cartridge Co. Vs. Emmerson US Supreme Court · May 19, 1930
  6. Ford Motor Co. Vs. Beauchamp US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1939
  7. Hump HairpIn Mfg. Co. Vs. Emmerson US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1922
  8. U.S. 416 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court International Harvester Co. v. Evatt
    Search
  9. U.S. 416 (1947) International Harvester Co. v. Evatt
    Search
  10. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Pfost
    Search
  11. Freeman v. Hewit
    Search
  12. U. S. 249 . See also Adams Mfg. Co. v. Storen
    Search
  13. sales agencies' business and their sales to Ohio customers were intrastate activities. International Harvester Co. v. Department
    Search
  14. value of the privilege to do an intrastate business merely because it also does an interstate business. Ford Motor Co. v. Beauchamp
    Search
  15. includes receipts from interstate sales affect the validity of a fair apportionment. See e.g., Hump Hairpin Mfg. Co. v. Emmerson
    Search
  16. only. The tax was also held to be in violation of the Equal Protection clause. Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. Day
    Search
  17. of the same amounts for the respective years which application of this formula has produced. See Hump Hairpin Mfg. Co. v. Emmerson
    Search
  18. is sufficient. Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  19. make apportionments. See cases collected in opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Stone, dissenting, Northwest Airlines v. Minnesota
    Search
  20. Since it has not been demonstrated that the apportionment here achieves an unfair result, cf. Hans Rees' Sons, Inc. v. North
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court International Harvester Co. v. Evatt
    Search
  22. Adams Mfg. Co. v. Storen
    Search
  23. International Harvester Co. v. Department
    Search
  24. Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. Day
    Search
  25. See Hump Hairpin Mfg. Co. v. Emmerson
    Search
  26. Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  27. Northwest Airlines v. Minnesota
    Search
  28. Hans Rees' Sons, Inc. v. North
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales