Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Testa Vs. Katt

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 10, 1947

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

43 entries 4 linked 39 unlinked
Show
  1. Prigg Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1842
  2. ClaflIn Vs. Houseman US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  3. Hines Vs. Lowrey US Supreme Court · Nov 07, 1938
  4. Huntington Vs. Attrill US Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1892
  5. U.S. 386 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court Testa v. Katt
    Search
  6. U.S. 386 (1947) Testa v. Katt
    Search
  7. the state courts were not free under Article VI of the Constitution to refuse enforcement of the claim. Claflin v. Houseman
    Search
  8. Mondou v. New
    Search
  9. maintained in the courts of that State. The State Supreme Court rested its holding on its earlier decision in Robinson v. Norato
    Search
  10. because the Rhode Island Supreme Court's holding was alleged to conflict with this Court's previous holding in Mondou v. New
    Search
  11. to review the phase of the controversy concerning the relationship of state courts to the Federal Government. Claflin v. Houseman
    Search
  12. Id. at 93 U. S. 137 . And see United States v. Bank
    Search
  13. But when, in Mondou v. New
    Search
  14. Minneapolis & St.L. R. Co. v. Bombolis
    Search
  15. case prior decisions to the effect that federal courts are not required to enforce state penal laws. Compare Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  16. Ins. Co., 127 U. S. 265 , with Massachusetts v. Missouri
    Search
  17. Louis & S.F. R. Co., 292 U. S. 230 , and compare Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search
  18. s opinion. It is the judgment of the Superior Court which petitioner asked us to review on certiorari. See Joslin Co. v. Providence
    Search
  19. Fox v. Ohio
    Search
  20. United States v. Lathrop
    Search
  21. Tennessee v. Davis
    Search
  22. Baltimore & O. R. v. Kepner
    Search
  23. Miles v. Illinois
    Search
  24. lies in an earlier English case, Folliott v. Ogden
    Search
  25. H.Bl. 124 (1789), aff'd., Ogden v. Folliott
    Search
  26. Leflar Extrastate Enforcement of Penal and Government Claims, 46 Harv.L.Rev.193, 195 (1932). See Griffin v. McCoach
    Search
  27. Hines v. Lowrey
    Search
  28. Huntington v. Attrill
    Search
  29. Anglo-American Provision Co. v. Davis
    Search
  30. Kenney v. Supreme
    Search
  31. Newman v. George
    Search
  32. U.S. Supreme Court Testa v. Katt
    Search
  33. Robinson v. Norato
    Search
  34. the Federal Government. Claflin v. Houseman
    Search
  35. United States v. Bank
    Search
  36. Compare Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  37. Massachusetts v. Missouri
    Search
  38. See Joslin Co. v. Providence
    Search
  39. Folliott v. Ogden
    Search
  40. Ogden v. Folliott
    Search
  41. See Griffin v. McCoach
    Search
  42. United States v. Bailey
    Search
  43. Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales