Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

icc Vs. Mechling

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 31, 1947

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 28 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 567 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court ICC v. Mechling
    Search
  2. U.S. 567 (1947) Interstate Commerce Commission v. Mechling
    Search
  3. ICC v. Inland
    Search
  4. rate charged for a shipment from Chicago to the east which originates in Chicago. See Atchison, T. & S.F. R. Co. v. United
    Search
  5. This was the barge v. rail
    Search
  6. Cargill, Inc. v. United
    Search
  7. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Inland
    Search
  8. Cf. United States v. Chicago
    Search
  9. Board of Trade of Kansas City v. United
    Search
  10. of barge transportation in whole or in part. Cf. Mitchell v. United
    Search
  11. barge companies of the inherent advantages of water transportation guaranteed to them by Congress. See United States v. Chicago
    Search
  12. usually make Page 330 U. S. 583 a specific extra charge for transit service. See Central R. Co. of N.J. v. United
    Search
  13. Atchison, T. & S.F. R. Co. v. United
    Search
  14. ex-rail grain moving from the same localities and requiring the same service as does the ex-barge grain. Cf. Florida v. United
    Search
  15. North Carolina v. United
    Search
  16. from permitting the controversial rates to become effective. This question is now moot, but see Inland Steel Co. v. United
    Search
  17. this appeal. Since the United States was necessarily a party in the District Court, 28 U.S.C. 46, Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore
    Search
  18. was heard and the record was closed before the 1940 Transportation Act became a law. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Inland
    Search
  19. In United States v. Chicago
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court ICC v. Mechling
    Search
  21. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Mechling
    Search
  22. Chicago. See Atchison, T. & S.F. R. Co. v. United
    Search
  23. Cf. Mitchell v. United
    Search
  24. Congress. See United States v. Chicago
    Search
  25. See Central R. Co. of N.J. v. United
    Search
  26. Cf. Florida v. United
    Search
  27. Inland Steel Co. v. United
    Search
  28. Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial