Citation network
Trailmobile Co. Vs. Whirls
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 14, 1947
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 40 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSearch
-
Page 331 U. S. 41 MR. JUSTICE RUTLEDGE delivered the opinion of the Court. This case, like Fishgold v. SullivanSearch
-
had determined the seniority rights of Whirls, making the issue now raised res judicata for this suit. See Angel v. BullingtonSearch
-
with questions of unlawful discrimination allegedly arising out of the suggested facts, under the decisions in Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Tunstall v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, 323 U. S. 210 , and Wallace Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
in the lower courts, and no evidence was introduced by any party to the issue of unfair discrimination. Cf. Hormel v. HelveringSearch
-
is said therefore not only to be effective for that year, cf. Fishgold v. SullivanSearch
-
clauses. Fishgold v. SullivanSearch
-
Fishgold v. SullivanSearch
-
Temp.L.Q. 355, 370, 371. The class suit was filed and determined before the decisions were rendered here in Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Wallace Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
Hess v. TrailerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Section 8(e) of the Selective Training and Service Act, quoted in Fishgold v. SullivanSearch
-
Ryan v. NewSearch
-
Casey v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
Dillon v. GlossSearch
-
Hust v. Moore-McCormackSearch
-
will remain in the same Page 331 U. S. 67 job for one year without diminution of its incidents. See Fishgold v. SullivanSearch
-
Emphasis added.) Fishgold v. SullivanSearch
-
the individual from being represented by others, but also prevents him from bargaining for himself. J. I. Case Co. v. LaborSearch
-
Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
U.S. at 323 U. S. 202 . And in Tunstall v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
Neither may a union use its own power over its members to bypass the courts. Cf. Dorchy v. KansasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSearch
-
See Angel v. BullingtonSearch
-
and Wallace Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
Cf. Hormel v. HelveringSearch
-
See Fishgold v. SullivanSearch
-
J. I. Case Co. v. LaborSearch
-
Cf. Dorchy v. KansasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial