Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Fleming Vs. Rhodes

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 28, 1947

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 7 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Sproles Vs. Binford US Supreme Court · May 23, 1932
  2. Calhoun Vs. Massie US Supreme Court · May 17, 1920
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. Vs. Henwood US Supreme Court · May 22, 1939
  4. Paramino Lumber Co. Vs. Marshall US Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1940
  5. Porter Vs. Lee US Supreme Court · May 27, 1946
  6. Porter Vs. Dicken US Supreme Court · May 27, 1946
  7. Bowles Vs. Willingham US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1944
  8. U.S. 100 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court Fleming v. Rhodes
    Search
  9. U.S. 100 (1947) Fleming v. Rhodes
    Search
  10. legal proceedings. The constitutionality of the price control acts, generally considered, is unquestioned. Bowles v. Willingham
    Search
  11. of the price control legislation, by advancing the effective date of the act, is constitutional. Compare Blodgett v. Holden
    Search
  12. U. S. 142 , 275 U. S. 146 , and Untermeyer v. Anderson
    Search
  13. U. S. 440 , 276 U. S. 445 , with United States v. Hudson
    Search
  14. The last three words were construed in Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant
    Search
  15. circumstances because of their repugnance to federal law. This was a settled construction for the words. See Kepner v. United
    Search
  16. Garment Workers v. Donnelly
    Search
  17. Blackmer v. United
    Search
  18. Virginian R. Co. v. System
    Search
  19. Carmichael v. Southern
    Search
  20. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Mottley
    Search
  21. Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co. v. Schubert
    Search
  22. Norman v. Baltimore
    Search
  23. Wright v. Union
    Search
  24. great public importance, such as the constitutionality of legislation, are at stake. In Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant
    Search
  25. I would dismiss this appeal and remand the case to the Circuit Court of Appeals. See Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  26. Packing Co., 292 U. S. 386 , 292 U. S. 392 , and Phillips v. United
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Fleming v. Rhodes
    Search
  28. Compare Blodgett v. Holden
    Search
  29. and Untermeyer v. Anderson
    Search
  30. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant
    Search
  31. See Kepner v. United
    Search
  32. In Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant
    Search
  33. the Circuit Court of Appeals. See Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  34. and Phillips v. United
    Search
  35. United States v. Hudson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial