Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Myers Vs. Reading Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 02, 1947

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 3 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Pennsylvania R. Co. Vs. Chamberlain US Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1933
  2. Lavender Vs. Kurn US Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1946
  3. Atlantic City R. Co. Vs. Parker US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1916
  4. Myers v. Reading
    Search
  5. Co. - 331 U.S. 477 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court Myers v. Reading
    Search
  6. Co., 331 U.S. 477 (1947) Myers v. Reading
    Search
  7. upon a violation of the Safety Appliance Acts, in the light of our decision rendered on March 25, 1946, in Lavender v. Kurn
    Search
  8. Brady v. Terminal
    Search
  9. R. Assn., 303 U. S. 10 , 303 U. S. 15 , and cases there cited. See also Atlantic City R. Co. v. Parker
    Search
  10. Great Northern R. Co. v. Otos
    Search
  11. Chicago B. & Q. R. Co. v. United
    Search
  12. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. R. Co. v. Taylor
    Search
  13. Spotts v. Baltimore
    Search
  14. Didinger v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  15. and after the occasion in question. The test, in fact, is the performance of the appliance. Philadelphia & R.R. Co. v. Auchenbach
    Search
  16. to the ground, is such substantial evidence of inefficiency as to make an issue for the jury. Detroit, T. & I. R. Co. v. Hahn
    Search
  17. O. R. Co., supra, at 162. Page 331 U. S. 484 See also Wild v. Pitcairn
    Search
  18. Mo. 915, 149 S.W.2d 800, and Newkirk v. Los
    Search
  19. to support the verdict for the petitioner, whether tested by the formula used by this Court in Improvement Co. v. Munson
    Search
  20. Slocum v. New
    Search
  21. Tennant v. Peoria
    Search
  22. or Lavender v. Kurn
    Search
  23. Galloway v. United
    Search
  24. P.U. R. Co., supra, at pp. 321 U. S. 32 -33. See also Blair v. Baltimore
    Search
  25. Brady v. Southern
    Search
  26. Western & A. R. Co. v. Hughes
    Search
  27. U. S. 496 , and Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Groeger
    Search
  28. See Griswold v. Gardner
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Myers v. Reading
    Search
  30. Philadelphia & R.R. Co. v. Auchenbach
    Search
  31. Detroit, T. & I. R. Co. v. Hahn
    Search
  32. Wild v. Pitcairn
    Search
  33. and Newkirk v. Los
    Search
  34. Improvement Co. v. Munson
    Search
  35. Blair v. Baltimore
    Search
  36. and Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Groeger
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial