Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Sec Vs. Chenery Corp.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 23, 1947

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 1 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Chicago US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1849
  2. SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  3. Corp. - 332 U.S. 194 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  4. Corp., 332 U.S. 194 (1947) Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery
    Search
  5. stock of the reorganized company, like other preferred stock, but should be surrendered at cost plus interest. In SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  6. F.2d 6 reversed. Upon remand to the Securities and Exchange Commission of the case decided by this Court in SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  7. S. 196 MR. JUSTICE MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court. This case is here for the second time. In SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  8. from expressing any views as to the propriety of an order rooted in the proper and relevant considerations. See Siegel v. Federal
    Search
  9. that the Commission would give full effect to its duties in harmony with the views we had expressed. Ford Motor Co. v. Labor
    Search
  10. Federal Radio Commission v. Nelson
    Search
  11. S. 201 management no vested right to receive the benefits of such an order. See Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville
    Search
  12. is one that lies primarily in the informed discretion of the administrative agency. See Columbia Broadcasting System v. United
    Search
  13. retroactive application of a new standard, it is not the type of retroactivity which is condemned by law. See Addison v. Holly
    Search
  14. to ordinary administrative action. The wisdom of the principle adopted is none of our concern. See Board of Trade v. United
    Search
  15. upon substantial evidence and is consistent with the authority granted by Congress. See National Broadcasting Co. v. United
    Search
  16. of the Commission's judgment save where it has plainly abused its discretion in these matters. See United States v. Lowden
    Search
  17. ICC v. Railway
    Search
  18. are best equipped to make and which justifies the use of the administrative process. See Republic Aviation Corporation v. Labor
    Search
  19. Together with No. 82, Securities & Exchange Commission v. Federal
    Search
  20. order which only recently it held invalid. Page 332 U. S. 210 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery
    Search
  21. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery
    Search
  22. law that goes beyond any judicial discretion, as well as beyond any legislative delegation. Compare United States v. Standard
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  24. In SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  25. See Siegel v. Federal
    Search
  26. Ford Motor Co. v. Labor
    Search
  27. See Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville
    Search
  28. See Columbia Broadcasting System v. United
    Search
  29. See Addison v. Holly
    Search
  30. See Board of Trade v. United
    Search
  31. Congress. See National Broadcasting Co. v. United
    Search
  32. See United States v. Lowden
    Search
  33. See Republic Aviation Corporation v. Labor
    Search
  34. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Federal
    Search
  35. Compare United States v. Standard
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial