Citation network
Cox Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 24, 1947
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Cox v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 332 U.S. 442 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court Cox v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 332 U.S. 442 (1947) Cox v. UnitedSearch
-
board was arbitrary and capricious or without basis in fact. At that time the lower federal courts interpreted Falbo v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 549 , as meaning that no judicial review of any sort could be had of a selective service order. In Estep v. UnitedSearch
-
they are entitled to raise the issue as a defense in a criminal prosecution for absence without leave. Gibson v. UnitedSearch
-
as we said in Estep v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Eagles v. UnitedSearch
-
States ex rel. Samuels, 329 U. S. 304 , and Eagles v. UnitedSearch
-
classified was improper. In Estep v. UnitedSearch
-
right to jury trial does not include the right to have a jury pass on the validity of an administrative order. Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
Estep v. UnitedSearch
-
record of the former hearing with right to adduce additional evidence) in a criminal trial, and relies on Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Together with No. 67, Thompson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, and No. 68, Roisum v. UnitedSearch
-
of the statute, giving exemption to regular and duly ordained ministers of religion and students, see Eagles v. UnitedSearch
-
the opinion was withdrawn, and on October 4, the court handed down an opinion affirming the judgments. In Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
of the issue of classification to the jury constituted reversible error. But cf. United States ex rel. Kulick v. KennedySearch
-
Steele v. UnitedSearch
-
Ford v. UnitedSearch
-
Jenkins v. DaviesSearch
-
See Goff v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 135 F.2d 610, and United States v. MessersmithSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cox v. UnitedSearch
-
Falbo v. UnitedSearch
-
In Estep v. UnitedSearch
-
Gibson v. UnitedSearch
-
and Eagles v. UnitedSearch
-
Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSearch
-
Thompson v. UnitedSearch
-
Roisum v. UnitedSearch
-
Eagles v. UnitedSearch
-
In Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
Kulick v. KennedySearch
-
Jenkins v. DaviesSearch
-
and United States v. MessersmithSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial