Citation network
Marsh Vs. Alabama
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 07, 1946
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 501 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Marsh v. AlabamaSearch
-
U.S. 501 (1946) Marsh v. AlabamaSearch
-
a company town, it would have been clear that appellant's conviction must be reversed. Under our decision in Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
be justified on the ground that the Page 326 U. S. 505 municipality holds legal title to them. Jamison v. TexasSearch
-
not, without jeopardizing that vital individual freedom, prohibit door to door distribution of literature. Martin v. StruthersSearch
-
become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it. Cf. Republic Aviation Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
companies, which unconstitutionally interferes with and discriminates against interstate commerce. Port Richmond Ferry v. HudsonSearch
-
South Carolina Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
traffic or to discriminate against interstate commerce. See Page 326 U. S. 507 County Commissioners v. ChandlerSearch
-
Donovan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Covington Drawbridge Co. v. ShepherdSearch
-
in the town, and a street and sidewalk on that business block. Cf. Barney v. KeokukSearch
-
Hague v. CIOSearch
-
dissent of Chief Justice Stone in Jones v. OpelikaSearch
-
Follett v. McCormickSearch
-
of, and the public's holding the title to, or having received an irrevocable easement in, the premises. Demopolis v. WebbSearch
-
Hamilton v. TownSearch
-
Town of Leeds v. SharpSearch
-
Forney v. CalhounSearch
-
Cloverdale Homes v. CloverdaleSearch
-
to the public may also be decisive of whether, under Alabama law, obstructing the road constitutes a crime, Beverly v. StateSearch
-
Ala.App. 451, 185 So. 768, and whether certain action on or near the road amounts to a tort. Thrasher v. BurrSearch
-
Clark's Ferry Bridge Co. v. PublicSearch
-
American Toll Bridge Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
Port Richmond Ferry v. HudsonSearch
-
Covington & L. Turnpike Road Co. v. SandfordSearch
-
Norfolk & S. Turnpike Co. v. VirginiaSearch
-
people of freedom of press and religion than it can discriminate against commerce. In his dissenting opinion in Jones v. OpelikaSearch
-
unaided by Congressional legislation, from burdensome taxation under the commerce clause, see Gwin, White & Prince v. HennefordSearch
-
McCarroll v. DixieSearch
-
at 321 U. S. 577 . MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, concurring. So long as the views which prevailed in Jones v. OpelikaSearch
-
Martin v. StruthersSearch
-
objection to his presence is that he is exercising an asserted right to spread there his religious views. See Marrone v. WashingtonSearch
-
of religious exercises beyond public places or to private places without the assent of the owner. Compare Martin v. StruthersSearch
-
they are a matter for adjustment between owner and licensee, or by appropriate legislation. Compare Western Turf Assn. v. GreenbergSearch
-
of solicitation was the result of a regulatory statute, and was not a Constitutional right. Republic Aviation Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
to point out that the owner of property may protect himself against the intrusion of strangers. Although, in Martin v. StruthersSearch
-
that it would protect the householder, after notice. The right to communicate ideas was expressed by us in Jamison v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Marsh v. AlabamaSearch
-
Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
Jamison v. TexasSearch
-
Cf. Republic Aviation Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
South Carolina Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
County Commissioners v. ChandlerSearch
-
Cf. Barney v. KeokukSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial