Citation network
Meyer Vs. Fleming
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 04, 1946
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 161 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Meyer v. FlemingSearch
-
U.S. 161 (1946) Meyer v. FlemingSearch
-
instituted by a creditor may not be defeated merely by reason of the fact that he has become a bankrupt. Thatcher v. RockwellSearch
-
He is in position to take control of the litigation. He may, as indicated in Johnson v. CollierSearch
-
As stated in Johnson v. CollierSearch
-
which the management should have started had it performed its duty. The corporation is a necessary party. Davenport v. DowsSearch
-
That decision might be dictated by the speculative nature of the suit and the expense involved, as Johnson v. CollierSearch
-
of the estate, should have the opportunity to make the choice which is most advantageous to the estate. Cf. Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
to determine how causes of action which have become a part of the bankruptcy estate shall be enforced. See Porter v. SabinSearch
-
Klein v. PeterSearch
-
before the court. As we have said, the corporation is a necessary party in a stockholders' derivative suit. Davenport v. DowsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
be any such inconsistency in view of the fact that the plan makes no provision for the claim. As stated in Johnson v. CollierSearch
-
Isaacs v. HobbsSearch
-
Continental Illinois Nat'l Bank v. ChicagoSearch
-
Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
Petroleum Co., 309 U. S. 478 , 309 U. S. 483 . And see Thompson v. TerminalSearch
-
Dauciger v. SmithSearch
-
Bluegrass Canning Co. v. StewardSearch
-
Paradise v. VogtlandischeSearch
-
Bennett v. AssociatedSearch
-
Griffin v. MutualSearch
-
If the suit is continued by the bankrupt, the trustee is concluded by the judgment. Eyster v. GaffSearch
-
As stated in Van der Stegen v. NeussSearch
-
may have. He is not bound to accept burdensome property nor unprofitable contracts ( Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co. v. HurleySearch
-
U. S. 213 U.S. 126), nor is he obliged to intervene in any action pending by or against the bankrupt. Kessler v. HerklotzSearch
-
Fleming v. CourtenaySearch
-
action is one that might have passed to the trustee. The bankrupt may continue the prosecution of the action. Griffin v. MutualSearch
-
See Missouri, K. & T. Trust Co. v. GermanSearch
-
Boston Elevated Ry. Co. v. PaulSearch
-
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Cf. American Steel Foundries v. ChicagoSearch
-
Seagrist v. ReidSearch
-
Meyer v. PageSearch
-
Floyd v. LaytonSearch
-
receivership estate as to require that it be continued only under the auspices of the trustee or receiver. See Adler v. SeamanSearch
-
Seaman v. McCullochSearch
-
McAnarney v. LembeckSearch
-
Coyle v. SkirvinSearch
-
claim is equitable, the claimant is not chargeable with laches, and the assets have not been distributed ( see Conklin v. UnitedSearch
-
Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. NewSearch
-
F. 721, 740-742), and provided further that the late filing does not unduly delay the proceedings. Guaranty Trust Co. v. HenwoodSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Meyer v. FlemingSearch
-
Johnson v. CollierSearch
-
Cf. Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
See Porter v. SabinSearch
-
Thompson v. TerminalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial