Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Estep Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 04, 1946

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

66 entries 6 linked 60 unlinked
Show
  1. Stark Vs. Wickard US Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1944
  2. Ng Fung Ho Vs. White US Supreme Court · May 29, 1922
  3. United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer Vs. Commissioner US Supreme Court · Jan 03, 1927
  4. Lockerty Vs. Phillips US Supreme Court · May 10, 1943
  5. Billings Vs. Truesdell US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1944
  6. Estep v. United
    Search
  7. States - 327 U.S. 114 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Estep v. United
    Search
  8. States, 327 U.S. 114 (1946) Estep v. United
    Search
  9. as a minister of religion and classifying him as available for military service was beyond its jurisdiction. Falbo v. United
    Search
  10. Reversed, p. 327 U. S. 125 . MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. In Falbo v. United
    Search
  11. martial for disobedience of military orders. He filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus ,which was denied, Smith v. Richart
    Search
  12. F.Supp. 582. While his Page 327 U. S. 118 appeal was pending, we decided Billings v. Truesdell
    Search
  13. jury, and a sentence of three and one-half years was imposed. The judgment of conviction was affirmed on appeal. Smith v. United
    Search
  14. under it. An order to report for induction is such a duty, and it includes the duty to submit to induction. Billings v. Truesdell
    Search
  15. the exercise of the general jurisdiction which Congress has conferred upon them. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty
    Search
  16. Gegious v. Uhl
    Search
  17. U. S. 288 . Judicial review may indeed be required by the Constitution. Ng Fung Ho v. White
    Search
  18. on the whole setting of the particular statute and the scheme of regulation which is adopted. Switchmen's Union v. Mediation
    Search
  19. That case could be comparable to Tung v. United
    Search
  20. See Goff v. United
    Search
  21. States, 135 F.2d 610, 612. Falbo v. United
    Search
  22. Together with No. 66, Smith v. United
    Search
  23. Chin Yow v. United
    Search
  24. Mabler v. Eby
    Search
  25. judicial inquiry when a registrant after induction seeks release from the military by habeas corpus. See United States v. Cain
    Search
  26. In only a few of them was the issue presented here necessary for decision. The question was reserved in United States v. Pitt
    Search
  27. Fletcher v. United
    Search
  28. United States v. Rinko
    Search
  29. Gibson v. United
    Search
  30. Koch v. United
    Search
  31. See United States v. Grieme
    Search
  32. United States v. Kauten
    Search
  33. United States v. Mroz
    Search
  34. Biron v. Collins
    Search
  35. Fujii v. United
    Search
  36. Thus, in United States v. Grieme
    Search
  37. way of challenging the jurisdiction of the draft boards under the 1917 Act. But, as we pointed out in Billings v. Truesdell
    Search
  38. But, as Billings v. Truesdell
    Search
  39. defendant in the Falbo case, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied. United States ex rel. Falbo v. Kennedy
    Search
  40. F.2d 689. And, in a like situation, habeas corpus was denied in advance of the trial. Albert v. Goguen
    Search
  41. corrective procedures had been available which might have afforded relief from the orders complained of. See Bowen v. Johnston
    Search
  42. McVeigh v. United
    Search
  43. claims that must be assumed to be true for purposes of the cases before us. But the courts below, relying upon Falbo v. United
    Search
  44. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United
    Search
  45. This principle has been applied many times in the past for the benefit of corporations. Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben
    Search
  46. Dayton-Goose Creek R. Co. v. United
    Search
  47. Prentis v. Atlantic
    Search
  48. U.S. Supreme Court Estep v. United
    Search
  49. Falbo v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial