Citation network
Case Vs. Bowles
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 04, 1946
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 92 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Case v. BowlesSearch
-
U.S. 92 (1946) Case v. BowlesSearch
-
not bar the sale of school land timber at a price above the ceiling fixed pursuant to that Act, Soundview. Pulp Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
Emergency Price Control Act did not bar the sale of school land timber at prices above the ceiling. Soundview Pulp Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
F.2d 777. Because the Circuit Court's decision conflicted with that of the Supreme Court of Idaho in Twin Falls County v. HulbertSearch
-
Query v. UnitedSearch
-
To that extent, section 205(c) of the Price Control Act supersedes section 233 of the Judicial Code. United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
has granted exclusive initial jurisdiction to determine this question to the Emergency Court of Appeals. Lockerty v. PhillipsSearch
-
it does not deny him the right to attack the Emergency Price Control Act itself on Constitutional grounds. Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
state, like those here involved, transferred exclusive ownership and control over those lands to the state. Cooper v. RobertsSearch
-
the ceiling price fixed by the Administrator is Constitutionally invalid as applied to privately owned timber. Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
and we reject it as a guide in the field here involved. Cf. United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
would be to read it as a self-defeating charter. It has never been so interpreted. Since the decision in McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse the judgment for the reasons act forth in his dissenting opinion in Hulbert v. TwinSearch
-
United States v. LouisianaSearch
-
United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Ohio v. HelveringSearch
-
California v. UnitedSearch
-
The Emergency Court of Appeals recently considered the same question and reached the same conclusion. Dallas v. BowlesSearch
-
See the several opinions in Saratoga Springs Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Oklahoma v. AtkinsonSearch
-
For application of this principle see Hines v. DavidowitzSearch
-
Stewart & Co. v. SadrakulaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Case v. BowlesSearch
-
Act, Soundview. Pulp Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
Soundview Pulp Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
Twin Falls County v. HulbertSearch
-
of the Judicial Code. United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
the Emergency Court of Appeals. Lockerty v. PhillipsSearch
-
Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
Hulbert v. TwinSearch
-
Dallas v. BowlesSearch
-
Saratoga Springs Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. DarbySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial