Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. Vs. Walling

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 11, 1946

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

67 entries 3 linked 64 unlinked
Show
  1. Hale Vs. Henkel US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  2. Endicott Johnson Corp. Vs. Perkins US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1943
    Relied / Followed
  3. interstate Commerce Commission Vs. Brimson US Supreme Court · May 26, 1894
  4. U.S. 186 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling
    Search
  5. U.S. 186 (1946) Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling
    Search
  6. F.2d 60), and relied upon Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Perkins
    Search
  7. is Page 327 U. S. 193 without merit. Associated Press v. Labor
    Search
  8. Board, 301 U. S. 103 , and Associated Press v. United
    Search
  9. Mabee v. White
    Search
  10. long hours, Congress likewise may strike directly at those evils when they adversely affect commerce. United States v. Darby
    Search
  11. a) is hardly more than a suggestion, and is dismissed accordingly. Cf. Buck v. Bell
    Search
  12. Reliance upon Grosjean v. American
    Search
  13. its applicability to the publishing business considered independently of the Amendment's influence. Associated Press v. Labor
    Search
  14. Associated Press v. United
    Search
  15. notwithstanding their exclusion from the privilege against self-incrimination, the same leading case of Wilson v. United
    Search
  16. States, 221 U. S. 361 , distinguishing the earlier quite different one of Boyd v. United
    Search
  17. been followed. Nor in any has Congress been adjudged to have exceeded its authority, with the single exception of Boyd v. United
    Search
  18. established by many precedents. More recent confirmation of those rulings may be found in Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Perkins
    Search
  19. supra, and Myers v. Bethlehem
    Search
  20. was held by the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in No. 61, following the lead of the Eighth Circuit in Walling v. Benson
    Search
  21. of Congress and that the records sought were relevant to that purpose. Actually, in view of today's ruling in Mabee v. White
    Search
  22. Blair v. United
    Search
  23. Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  24. will subject them to inconvenience, expense and harassment. That argument is answered fully by what was said in Myers v. Bethlehem
    Search
  25. personal liberty are effective only to recall Mr. Justice Cardozo's reply to the same exaggerated forebodings in Jones v. Securities
    Search
  26. Together with No. 63 News Printing Co., Inc. v. Wallin
    Search
  27. Sun Publishing Co. v. Walling
    Search
  28. Fleming v. Lowell
    Search
  29. its mandate by excluding from commerce the circulation of a publisher refusing to conform. Cf. Sun Publishing Co. v. Walling
    Search
  30. Wilson v. United
    Search
  31. Essgee Co. v. United
    Search
  32. United States v. Bausch
    Search
  33. United States v. White
    Search
  34. Myers v. Bethlehem
    Search
  35. Cong.Rec. 9248, 9254. See also Cudahy Packing Co. v. Holland
    Search
  36. and specific investigations, one for gathering statistical information concerning entire industries, cf. Walling v. American
    Search
  37. See Federal Trade Commission v. American
    Search
  38. authorize one of its subordinate agencies to sweep all our traditions into the fire ( Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson
    Search
  39. See also note 40 Cf. Boyd v. United
    Search
  40. Harriman v. Interstate
    Search
  41. Development of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution 137, citing Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson
    Search
  42. U. S. 43 , 201 U. S. 76 . Cf. Boyd v. United
    Search
  43. See, in addition to the better known accounts of writs of assistance cited in Goldman v. United
    Search
  44. Mr. Justice Cardozo, with whom joined the present CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice Brandeis, dissenting in Jones v. Securities
    Search
  45. ff. On the other hand, the case for protected privacy was put by Mr. Justice Brandeis, dissenting, in Olmstead v. United
    Search
  46. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baird
    Search
  47. U.S. Supreme Court Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling
    Search
  48. Associated Press v. Labor
    Search
  49. and Associated Press v. United
    Search
  50. Cf. Buck v. Bell
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial