Citation network
Duncan Vs. Kahanamoku
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 25, 1946
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 304 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Duncan v. KahanamokuSearch
-
U.S. 304 (1946) Duncan v. KahanamokuSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
military, could for days, months, or years close all the courts and supplant them with military tribunals. Cf. Coleman v. TennesseeSearch
-
expression of a General's will dictated by what he considers the imperious necessity of the moment. See United States v. DiekelmanSearch
-
whatever power it might have Page 327 U. S. 319 had to limit the application of the Constitution. Cf. Hawaii v. MankichiSearch
-
Together with No. 15, White v. SteerSearch
-
Carter v. McClaughrySearch
-
Hines v. MikellSearch
-
New Orleans v. SteamshipSearch
-
Co., 20 Wall. 387, 87 U. S. 393 , 22 L.Ed. 354 Dow v. JohnsonSearch
-
Traders' Bank v. UnionSearch
-
Wall. 276. Nor is this a case where violators of military orders are to be tried by regular courts. Cf. Hirabayashi v. UnitedSearch
-
Sterling v. ConstantinSearch
-
decisions of this Court relating to the applicability of the Constitution to United States Territories. Hawaii v. MankichiSearch
-
Rassmussen v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 284 . See also Frank, Ex Parte Milligan v. TheSearch
-
Hallam, Constitutional History, c. 3. See also discussions in dissent in Luther v. BordenSearch
-
Id. pp. 31, 32. See also, on the same subject, the dissent in Luther v. BordenSearch
-
civilians by military tribunals which were upheld by decisions of state and lower federal courts. State ex rel. Mays v. BrownSearch
-
McMasters v. WoltersSearch
-
Seymour v. FischerSearch
-
that all the governor had done was legal. The basis of these decisions was definitely held erroneous in Sterling v. ConstantinSearch
-
of the government are unable to function, or their functioning would itself threaten the public safety. Luther v. BordenSearch
-
United States v. RussellSearch
-
emergency is such as to give rise to the necessity of martial law, and in adapting it to the need. Cf. Hirabayashi v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Duncan v. KahanamokuSearch
-
Cf. Coleman v. TennesseeSearch
-
See United States v. DiekelmanSearch
-
of the Constitution. Cf. Hawaii v. MankichiSearch
-
White v. SteerSearch
-
Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. UnionSearch
-
Cf. Hirabayashi v. UnitedSearch
-
United States Territories. Hawaii v. MankichiSearch
-
Frank, Ex Parte Milligan v. TheSearch
-
Mays v. BrownSearch
-
McMasters v. WoltersSearch
-
Seymour v. FischerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial