Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lusthaus Vs. Commissioner

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 25, 1946

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 14 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Bullen Vs. Wisconsin US Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1916
  2. Helvering Vs. Horst US Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1940
  3. Helvering Vs. Eubank US Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1940
  4. Heiner Vs. Mellon US Supreme Court · May 16, 1938
  5. Crooks Vs. Harrelson US Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1930
  6. Karrick Vs. Hannaman US Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1897
  7. Meehan Vs. Valentine US Supreme Court · May 10, 1892
  8. Berthold Vs. Goldsmith US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1860
  9. Ward Vs. Thompson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1859
  10. Burnet Vs. Guggenheim US Supreme Court · Feb 06, 1933
  11. Bogardus Vs. Commissioner US Supreme Court · Nov 08, 1937
  12. Smith Vs. Shaughnessy US Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1943
  13. Lucas Vs. Earl US Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1930
  14. United States Vs. Pelzer US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1941
  15. U.S. 293 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Lusthaus v. Commissioner
    Search
  16. U.S. 293 (1946) Lusthaus v. Commissioner
    Search
  17. against petitioner for earnings reported as his wife's income is sustained for the reasons stated in Commissioner v. Tower
    Search
  18. MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is the same as in Commissioner v. Tower
    Search
  19. that the evidence did not support it. We hold that it did. For the reasons set out in our opinion in Commissioner v. Tower
    Search
  20. dissenting. As the Court considers, and as we do, the question in this case is the same as that in Commissioner v. Tower
    Search
  21. See Gregory v. Helvering
    Search
  22. only a hope. It is essential, too, we think, to note that, in these partnership cases, the tax doctrine of Lucas v. Earl
    Search
  23. to the property given, the gift cannot be taken as a gift of income before it was earned or payable, as in Lucas v. Earl
    Search
  24. to the donor. It was a gift of property which thereafter produced income which was taxable to the donee, as in Blair v. Commissioner
    Search
  25. Helvering v. Horst
    Search
  26. Aiton v. Slater
    Search
  27. as used in Section 182, Internal Revenue Code, means ordinary partnerships. Burk-Waggoner Assn. v. Hopkins
    Search
  28. and taxable to her under the Revenue Laws. This distinguishes the case from the short-term trust of Helvering v. Clifford
    Search
  29. Of course, federal tax provisions are not subject to state law. United States v. Pelzer
    Search
  30. Morgan v. Commissioner
    Search
  31. U. S. 271 , 304 U. S. 279 . See Blair v. Commissioner
    Search
  32. Uterhart v. United
    Search
  33. States, 240 U. S. 598 , 240 U. S. 603 . In Lucas v. Earl
    Search
  34. Campbell v. Northwest
    Search
  35. Helvering v. New
    Search
  36. Helvering v. American
    Search
  37. U.S. Supreme Court Lusthaus v. Commissioner
    Search
  38. Commissioner v. Tower
    Search
  39. of Lucas v. Earl
    Search
  40. Blair v. Commissioner
    Search
  41. Burk-Waggoner Assn. v. Hopkins
    Search
  42. of Helvering v. Clifford
    Search
  43. See Blair v. Commissioner
    Search
  44. In Lucas v. Earl
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial