Citation network
American Federation of Labor Vs. Watson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 25, 1946
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 582 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSearch
-
U.S. 582 (1946) American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSearch
-
Page 327 U. S. 589 of the controversy. But, without determining whether there was equity in the bill ( Douglas v. JeannetteSearch
-
U. S. 157 , 319 U. S. 162 -163) or whether, pursuant to the rule of Railroad Commission v. PullmanSearch
-
Chicago v. FielderestSearch
-
Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSearch
-
without allegation of any jurisdictional amount. See Hague v. CIOSearch
-
Douglas v. JeannetteSearch
-
Cf. Mulford v. SmithSearch
-
Peyton v. RailwaySearch
-
Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Tunstall v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
It is sometimes used to embrace all enactments, however adopted, to which a State gives the force of law. See Stevens v. GriffithSearch
-
Phillips v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 312 U. S. 246 , 312 U. S. 251 . And see Sterling v. ConstantinSearch
-
on the merits, it should not invoke its powers unless those who seek its aid have a cause of action in equity. Douglas v. JeannetteSearch
-
supra, pp. 319 U. S. 162 -163. The power of a court of equity to act is a discretionary one. Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSearch
-
Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
Di Giovanni v. CamdenSearch
-
The allegations certainly state a cause of action in equity no less clear than that sustained in Utah Fuel Co. v. NationalSearch
-
of prosecutions which is here alleged would not alone be sufficient to establish a cause of action in equity. Matthews v. RodgersSearch
-
Beal v. MissouriSearch
-
the merits might therefore amount to no more than an advisory opinion. In Railroad Commission Page 327 U. S. 599 v. PullmanSearch
-
City of Chicago v. FielderestSearch
-
Dairies, supra, and Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSearch
-
of proceedings in the state courts. But the problem is not unique. It was implicit in Railroad Commission v. PullmanSearch
-
the relief at law is measured by the character of the relief afforded by the federal not the state courts. Di Giovanni v. CamdenSearch
-
Mayo v. LakelandSearch
-
Tampa v. TampaSearch
-
Coleman v. StateSearch
-
Lummus v. MiamiSearch
-
See Porter v. FirstSearch
-
State v. AlsopSearch
-
State v. JonesSearch
-
Draughon v. HeitmanSearch
-
State v. EmersonSearch
-
American Bakeries Co. v. HainesSearch
-
Miami v. StateSearch
-
Bryan v. MiamiSearch
-
But, in Jetton-Dekle Lumber Co. v. MatherSearch
-
On quo warranto under Florida law, see State v. TampaSearch
-
State v. DuvalSearch
-
State v. PrevattSearch
-
See Mogul Steamship Co. v. McGregorSearch
-
Attorney General v. AdelaideSearch
-
Sheldon v. PowellSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial