Citation network
United States Vs. Rice
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 22, 1946
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 742 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. RiceSearch
-
U.S. 742 (1946) United States v. RiceSearch
-
of remand was deemed to be not reviewable by appeal or writ of error, because the order was not final. Railroad Co. v. WiswallSearch
-
extent the Government may be excluded from the operation of a statute in which it is not named, cf. United States v. StevensonSearch
-
U. S. 190 , 215 U. S. 197 , with United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
were not appealable, Page 327 U. S. 750 because nonfinal, they might be reviewed by mandamus. Railroad Co. v. WiswallSearch
-
that is, in all cases removed from state courts under any statute authorizing removal. See Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSearch
-
cannot be reviewed by mandamus. Ex parte Pennsylvania Co., supra, Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSearch
-
begun in state courts, is as pertinent to those removed by the United States as by any other suitor, see United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
removed under the Act of 1887, but to orders of remand made in cases removed under any other statutes as well. Cole v. GarlandSearch
-
F. 759, dismissed on appeal, 183 U.S. 693, approved in Gay v. RuffSearch
-
Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
supra, 299 U. S. 380 -381. It was so held with respect to the Act of 1926 in United States v. FixicoSearch
-
not to create doubts, but to resolve them when the real issue or statutory purpose is otherwise obscure. United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
The United States has a special function to perform in these Indian cases. It represents the public interest. Heckman v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. AmericanSearch
-
Dollar Savings Bank v. UnitedSearch
-
there is no such prohibition, mandamus is available to compel the District Court to preform its duty. Railroad Co. v. WiswallSearch
-
institute an independent suit and annul the prior decree entered in the suit to which it was not a party. Sunderland v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. RiceSearch
-
Railroad Co. v. WiswallSearch
-
United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
See Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSearch
-
Cole v. GarlandSearch
-
United States v. FixicoSearch
-
Heckman v. UnitedSearch
-
Sunderland v. UnitedSearch
-
Stanley v. SchwalbySearch
-
United States v. StevensonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial