Citation network
Heiser Vs. Woodruff
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 22, 1946
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 726 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Heiser v. WoodruffSearch
-
U.S. 726 (1946) Heiser v. WoodruffSearch
-
in the previous litigation, the allegations of fraud were not supported by tender of evidence or other proof. Pepper v. LittonSearch
-
and litigated in the suit. P. 327 U. S. 735 . Page 327 U. S. 727 7. Nothing decided in Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
judicata. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed. 150 F.2d 869. Relying upon our decisions in Pepper v. LittonSearch
-
U. S. 295 , and Prudence Realization Corp. v. GeistSearch
-
of fraud. The district court denied the motion, and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. Jackson v. HeiserSearch
-
was not indebted to petitioner, or that the allegations of the complaint were untrue. The court, relying on Pepper v. LittonSearch
-
in the federal courts, in diversity of citizenship cases, under the doctrine of Page 327 U. S. 732 Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSearch
-
S. 392 , can be other than that of the state in which the federal court sits. For nothing decided in Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
provable, or to be allowed, or how the bankrupt's estate is to be distributed among claimants. Cf. Board of Comm'rs v. UnitedSearch
-
D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. FDICSearch
-
Sola Electric Co. v. JeffersonSearch
-
Wragg v. FederalSearch
-
Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the same class, the bankruptcy court is defining and applying federal, not state, law. See Prudence Realization Corp. v. GeistSearch
-
United States v. PelzerSearch
-
U. S. 402 -403. It is true that a bankruptcy court is also a court of equity, Local Loan Co. v. HuntSearch
-
claims, including a fraudulent judgment where the issue of fraud has not been previously adjudicated. Pepper v. LittonSearch
-
of a course of conduct by the claimant which, as to them, would be fraudulent or otherwise inequitable. Taylor v. StandardSearch
-
heard, and the contested issue is decided against him, he may not later renew the litigation in another court. Baldwin v. TravelingSearch
-
Men's Assn., 283 U. S. 522 , 283 U. S. 525 . Before Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
in one court will be recognized as res judicata in a suit between the same parties in a federal court. Cromwell v. CountySearch
-
Baltimore S.S. Co. v. PhillipsSearch
-
Grubb v. PublicSearch
-
Utilities Comm'n, 281 U. S. 470 . See Baldwin v. IowaSearch
-
Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. v. SchendelSearch
-
Milwaukee County v. WhiteSearch
-
Co., 296 U. S. 268 , 296 U. S. 272 -273. It has been held in nondiversity cases since Erie v. TompkinsSearch
-
that the federal courts will apply their own rule of res judicata. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
Jackson v. IrvingSearch
-
in both state and federal courts to a plea of res judicata arising from decrees of a bankruptcy court. Stoll v. GottliebSearch
-
Chicot County Dist. v. BaxterSearch
-
Page 327 U. S. 734 the bankruptcy court, the decision against him is binding in the bankruptcy court. Davis v. FriedlanderSearch
-
Fischer v. PaulineSearch
-
by it, but as to all relevant issues which could have been but were not raised and litigated in the suit. Cromwell v. CountySearch
-
Chicot Page 327 U. S. 736 County Dist. v. BaxterSearch
-
them, the principles of res judicata preclude the revival of the litigation in the bankruptcy court. Pepper v. LittonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial