Citation network
Prudential Ins. Co. Vs. Benjamin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1946
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 408 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Prudential Ins. Co. v. BenjaminSearch
-
U.S. 408 (1946) Prudential Insurance Co. v. BenjaminSearch
-
in violation of the Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution, notwithstanding this Court's ruling in United States v. South-EasternSearch
-
Page 328 U. S. 410 MR. JUSTICE RUTLEDGE delivered the opinion of the Court. This case and Robertson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
post, p. 328 U. S. 440 , bring not unexpected sequels to United States v. South-EasternSearch
-
Underwriters Assn., 322 U. S. 533 . In cycle reminiscent conversely of views advanced there and in Paul v. VirginiaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the two great basic powers it comprehends. For this Court's Page 328 U. S. 413 part, from Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
power, because previously no attempted exercise of that authority had been brought here in litigation. But, from Paul v. VirginiaSearch
-
to New York Life Ins. Co. v. DeerSearch
-
until the question was squarely presented and answered otherwise in the South-Eastern case. Whether Paul v. VirginiaSearch
-
of South Carolina's tax. For they are not in point. As has been stated, they are the cases which from Welton v. MissouriSearch
-
the power of Congress over interstate and foreign commerce. On the contrary, it is, as Marshall declared in Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
bearing, as a matter of the practical consequences resulting from operation of the tax, upon that question. Robertson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Extending from Welton v. MissouriSearch
-
U. S. 275 , to Nippert v. RichmondSearch
-
U. S. 416 . See the collection of authorities in McGoldrick v. Berwind-WhiteSearch
-
prior to the South-Eastern decision or made without reference to its ruling, e.g., Lincoln National Ins. Co. v. ReadSearch
-
U. S. 421 , but indeed also Paul v. VirginiaSearch
-
the aggregate of which measures the tax, for which view it relies upon such diverse decisions as McGoldrick v. Berwind-WhiteSearch
-
Western Live Stock v. BureauSearch
-
of Revenue, 303 U. S. 250 , and Polish National Alliance v. LaborSearch
-
Cf. United States v. South-EasternSearch
-
E.g., Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
U. S. 251 , overruled by United States v. DarbySearch
-
C. Knight Co., 156 U. S. 1 , with United States v. AmericanSearch
-
Schechter Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Labor Board v. JonesSearch
-
Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U. S. 1 . See also discussion in Wickard v. FilburnSearch
-
See German Alliance Ins. Co. v. LewisSearch
-
Osborn v. OzlinSearch
-
United States v. South-EasternSearch
-
See Allgeyer v. LouisianaSearch
-
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. TafoyaSearch
-
Hoopeston Co. v. CullenSearch
-
St. Louis Southwestern R. Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSearch
-
International Harvester Co. v. DeptSearch
-
International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
Robertson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
McGoldrick v. Berwind-WhiteSearch
-
Nelson v. SearsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial