Citation network
Porter Vs. Warner Holding Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1946
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Porter v. WarnerSearch
-
Holding Co. - 328 U.S. 395 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Porter v. WarnerSearch
-
Holding Co., 328 U.S. 395 (1946) Porter v. WarnerSearch
-
respondent from continuing to collect rents in excess of the legal maximums, but declined to order restitution. Bowles v. WarnerSearch
-
certiorari because the result was in conflict with that reached by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bowles v. SkaggsSearch
-
assume an even broader and more flexible character than when only a private controversy is at stake. Virginian Ry. Co. v. SystemSearch
-
be necessary under the circumstances. Only in that way can equity do complete, rather than truncated, justice. Camp v. BoydSearch
-
Pet. 497, 35 U. S. 503 . See also Hecht Co. v. BowlesSearch
-
As recognized in Hecht Co. v. BowlesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
White v. SparkillSearch
-
to award complete relief even though the decree includes that which might be conferred by a court of law. Alexander v. HillmanSearch
-
left to the judicial process of adapting appropriate equitable remedies to specific situations. Cf. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
its discretion, to decree restitution of excessive charges in order to give effect to the policy of Congress. Clark v. SmithSearch
-
a), See Veazie v. WilliamsSearch
-
e). Bowles v. SkaggsSearch
-
a special and exclusive remedy, thereby negativing any jurisdiction that might otherwise be asserted. United States v. BabcockSearch
-
where equity jurisdiction is lacking because of a failure to exhaust prescribed administrative remedies. Myers v. BethlehemSearch
-
parties and settle the controversies, or to retain the case until the matters are otherwise litigated. Mallow v. HindeSearch
-
enjoined, the court of equity may restore the status quo by means of a mandatory injunction. Texas & N.O. R. Co. v. NorthsideSearch
-
and at the same time to create broad powers for enforcement, by various civil and criminal sanctions. Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
in the wealth, detail, precision, and completeness of its jurisdictional, procedural, and remedial provisions. Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
c). See Kraus & Bros. v. UnitedSearch
-
bring a suit for damages and penalties only when the buyer was not entitled to bring such an action. See, e.g., Bowles v. GlickSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Porter v. WarnerSearch
-
Bowles v. WarnerSearch
-
Bowles v. SkaggsSearch
-
Virginian Ry. Co. v. SystemSearch
-
Alexander v. HillmanSearch
-
Cf. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
of Congress. Clark v. SmithSearch
-
See Veazie v. WilliamsSearch
-
Myers v. BethlehemSearch
-
Texas & N.O. R. Co. v. NorthsideSearch
-
Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
See Kraus & Bros. v. UnitedSearch
-
Bowles v. GlickSearch
-
Brown v. SwannSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial