Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Knauer Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 10, 1946

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

54 entries 3 linked 51 unlinked
Show
  1. Ng Fung Ho Vs. White US Supreme Court · May 29, 1922
  2. United States Vs. Ness US Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1917
  3. United States Vs. Throckmorton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  4. Knauer v. United
    Search
  5. States - 328 U.S. 654 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Knauer v. United
    Search
  6. States, 328 U.S. 654 (1946) Knauer v. United
    Search
  7. U. S. 674 . 2. The standard of proof required in such proceedings is strict. Schneiderman v. United
    Search
  8. Baumgartner v. United
    Search
  9. a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted to examine that ruling in light of our decisions in Schneiderman v. United
    Search
  10. States, 320 U. S. 118 , and Baumgartner v. United
    Search
  11. connotes perjury, falsification, concealment, misrepresentation. When denaturalization is sought on this ( Baumgartner v. United
    Search
  12. States, supra ), as well as on other grounds ( Schneiderman v. United
    Search
  13. of proof required is strict. We do not accept even concurrent findings of two lower courts as conclusive. Baumgartner v. United
    Search
  14. who is sought to be restored to the status of an alien obtained his naturalization certificate illegally. Schneiderman v. United
    Search
  15. Luria v. United
    Search
  16. and make denaturalization proceedings the ready instrument for political persecutions. As stated in Schneiderman v. United
    Search
  17. the fate of a human being is at stake, we must not leave the presence of his evil purpose to conjecture. Cf. Bridges v. Wixon
    Search
  18. intentional misrepresentation, which is necessary in order to prove that the oath was perjurious. And, as Baumgartner v. United
    Search
  19. implications of the Page 328 U. S. 668 Nazi program until war came to us. And, as we stated in Schneiderman v. United
    Search
  20. against a prior judgment, on the ground that perjured testimony was introduced at the trial, was denied. United States v. Throckmorton
    Search
  21. U. S. 61 , 98 U. S. 66 . And see Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing
    Search
  22. broad powers of equity to set aside a decree for fraud practiced on the court which granted it. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire
    Search
  23. Co., 322 U. S. 238 . The present suit is an equity suit. Luria v. United
    Search
  24. Page 328 U. S. 673 to give added protection against fraud committed on the naturalization courts. United States v. Ness
    Search
  25. allegiance to his native country. Though the making of a false oath be called intrinsic fraud ( see United States v. Throckmorton
    Search
  26. Clause in Article I, Section 8. See Tutun v. United
    Search
  27. provide. A certificate obtained by fraud is clearly within the reach of Congressional power. As stated in Johannessen v. United
    Search
  28. Luria v. United
    Search
  29. of frauds against the nation. We cannot conclude that Congress, which may withhold the right of naturalization ( Tutun v. United
    Search
  30. See Perkins v. Elg
    Search
  31. the Bund are likewise not challenged here. For similar findings respecting the nature of the Bund, see United States v. Schuchhardt
    Search
  32. United States v. Ritzen
    Search
  33. United States v. Haas
    Search
  34. United States v. Wolter
    Search
  35. United States v. Sautter
    Search
  36. United States v. Holtz
    Search
  37. United States v. Baecker
    Search
  38. United States v. Bregler
    Search
  39. United States v. Wilmovski
    Search
  40. United States v. Claassen
    Search
  41. It was held in United States v. Ness
    Search
  42. Cong.Rec. p. 7040. The Court noted in United States v. Ness
    Search
  43. strings attached to their citizenship for its revocation can be neither free nor secure in their status. Schneiderman v. United
    Search
  44. Schneiderman v. United
    Search
  45. See Cramer v. United
    Search
  46. U.S. Supreme Court Knauer v. United
    Search
  47. and Baumgartner v. United
    Search
  48. Cf. Bridges v. Wixon
    Search
  49. Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing
    Search
  50. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial