Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Herb Vs. Pitcairn

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 05, 1945

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

49 entries 6 linked 43 unlinked
Show
  1. John Vs. Paullin US Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1913
  2. Berea College Vs. Kentucky US Supreme Court · Nov 09, 1908
  3. Fox Film Corp. Vs. Muller US Supreme Court · Dec 09, 1935
  4. De Saussure Vs. Gaillard US Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1888
  5. Johnson Vs. Risk US Supreme Court · Dec 08, 1890
  6. Murdock Vs. Memphis US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1873
  7. U.S. 117 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search
  8. U.S. 117 (1945) Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search
  9. without jurisdiction in any case where the cause of action arose outside the city where the court is located. Werner v. Illinois
    Search
  10. Mitchell v. Louisville
    Search
  11. Mondou v. New
    Search
  12. Douglas v. New
    Search
  13. York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 279 U. S. 377 , 279 U. S. 387 -388. And see Chambers v. Baltimore
    Search
  14. St. Louis I.M. & S. R. Co. v. Taylor
    Search
  15. construed the state jurisdiction and venue laws in a discriminatory fashion. In Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial
    Search
  16. Commission, 293 Ill. 62, 127 N.E. 80, and Gill v. Lynch
    Search
  17. that it will not review judgments of state courts that rest on adequate and independent state grounds. Murdock v. Memphis
    Search
  18. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers'
    Search
  19. clear whether the judgment rests on a federal ground or an adequate state one, this Court will not review. Klinger v. Missouri
    Search
  20. Wood Mowing Machine Co. v. Skinner
    Search
  21. Adams v. Russell
    Search
  22. Lynch v. New
    Search
  23. further consideration is not to review, in any proper sense of the term, the decision of the state court. Patterson v. Alabama
    Search
  24. State Tax Comm. v. Van
    Search
  25. Cott, 306 U. S. 511 , 306 U. S. 515 . And in Minnesota v. National
    Search
  26. the grounds of the decision below led the Court to vacate and remand for further consideration. National Tea Company v. State
    Search
  27. Minn. 443, 286 N.W. 360, and 208 Minn. 607, 294 N.W. 230. In Lynch v. New
    Search
  28. of its remittitur, there would be power and willingness to grant it. ,Later, in International Steel & Iron Co. v. National
    Search
  29. Together with No. 25, Belcher v. Louisville
    Search
  30. Upon parallel facts, Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search
  31. not be maintained because not commenced within the statutory time. Our disposition of the identical issue in Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search
  32. St. Louis, I.M. & S. R. Co. v. McWhirter
    Search
  33. on the part of an employee injured as the proximate result of that violation. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Layton
    Search
  34. Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Rigsby
    Search
  35. which these claims are filed, a liberal construction, and one which will promote, not defeat, its purpose. Swinson v. Chicago
    Search
  36. Belcher v. Louisville
    Search
  37. Werner v. Illinois
    Search
  38. U.S. Supreme Court Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search
  39. Chambers v. Baltimore
    Search
  40. In Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial
    Search
  41. and Gill v. Lynch
    Search
  42. Klinger v. Missouri
    Search
  43. Patterson v. Alabama
    Search
  44. Minnesota v. National
    Search
  45. National Tea Company v. State
    Search
  46. In Lynch v. New
    Search
  47. International Steel & Iron Co. v. National
    Search
  48. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Layton
    Search
  49. Swinson v. Chicago
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial