Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Barr Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 05, 1945

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 2 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Cramer Vs. Arthur US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  2. Hadden Vs. Merritt US Supreme Court · May 04, 1885
  3. Barr v. United
    Search
  4. States - 324 U.S. 83 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court Barr v. United
    Search
  5. States, 324 U.S. 83 (1945) Barr v. United
    Search
  6. certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for the date of this exportation. It was noted in United States v. Whitridge
    Search
  7. invoice currency in United States currency was 10 percent more or less than the proclaimed value. United States v. Whitridge
    Search
  8. Fry & Friedsam v. United
    Search
  9. for a measure of the true dollar values of imported merchandise for customs purposes which was accurate ( see Cramer v. Arthur
    Search
  10. serve as the measure of the valuation of the goods for purposes of the ad valorem tax. As noted in United States v. Whitridge
    Search
  11. it is unimportant that the particular application may not have been contemplated by the legislators. Puerto Rico v. Shell
    Search
  12. Browder v. United
    Search
  13. c) is in the category of administrative or executive action which this Court held nonreviewable in Cramer v. Arthur
    Search
  14. supra, and in Hadden v. Merritt
    Search
  15. U. S. 25 , 115 U. S. 27 -28. And see United States v. George
    Search
  16. and is to be contrasted to other situations in which the Secretary is exercising discretionary authority. Cf. Boske v. Comingore
    Search
  17. may not be exercised in such a way as to defeat the method of assessment which Congress has provided. Cf. Campbell v. United
    Search
  18. the fact that he acts pursuant to the directions of the Secretary does not save his decision from review. Campbell v. United
    Search
  19. The case is therefore different from Collector v. Richards
    Search
  20. and Boske v. Comingore
    Search
  21. by Congress, Puerto Rico v. Shell
    Search
  22. put when the legislation was passed. Browder Page 324 U. S. 100 v. United
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Barr v. United
    Search
  24. Puerto Rico v. Shell
    Search
  25. United States v. George
    Search
  26. Cf. Boske v. Comingore
    Search
  27. Cf. Campbell v. United
    Search
  28. Campbell v. United
    Search
  29. Collector v. Richards
    Search
  30. Congress, Puerto Rico v. Shell
    Search
  31. United States v. Whitridge
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial