Citation network
Akins Vs. Texas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 04, 1945
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 398 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court Akins v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. 398 (1945) Akins v. TexasSearch
-
Smith v. TexasSearch
-
Hill v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 400 . The burden is, of course, upon the defendant to establish the discrimination. Tarrance v. FloridaSearch
-
Martin v. TexasSearch
-
Akins v. StateSearch
-
S.W.2d 723, 724. This reference to the holdings of the state and federal courts was to Akens v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Tex.Cr.R. 289, 167 S.W.2d 758, which reversed a previous conviction of petitioner on the authority of Hill v. TexasSearch
-
racial representation on juries, recent decisions of that court had previously disapproved that procedure. Hamilton v. StateSearch
-
Hill v. StateSearch
-
for ourselves whether a federal constitutional right has been denied, expressly or in substance and effect, Norris v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 130 , we accord in that examination great respect to the conclusions of the state judiciary, Pierre v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 219 , 314 U. S. 238 , or equal protection. Cf. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
-
Malinski v. NewSearch
-
leaves a wide range of choice to the commissioners. Its validity, however, has been accepted by this Court. Smith v. TexasSearch
-
Fairness in selection has never been held to require proportional representation of races upon a jury. Virginia v. RivesSearch
-
Thomas v. TexasSearch
-
continual exclusion indicated discrimination, and not on the theory that racial groups must be recognized. Norris v. AlabamaSearch
-
race or by unequal application of the law to such an extent as to show intentional discrimination. Cf. Snowden v. HughesSearch
-
constitutional requirements as to the selection of grand juries, according to the interpretation of this Court in Hill v. TexasSearch
-
Page 325 U. S. 405 Hill v. TexasSearch
-
petitioner and one had appeared upon the other grand jury list which had been selected after the decision in Hill v. TexasSearch
-
the vacancy was filled by appointment or election. The court upheld the constitutionality of the statute. Pierson v. StateSearch
-
Fuller v. StateSearch
-
Jones v. StateSearch
-
Brown v. StateSearch
-
upon the federal courts as to the meaning of the state law, so far as any federal question is concerned. Hebert v. LouisianaSearch
-
Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySearch
-
mandate in selecting the grand jury which indicted the Negro petitioner. Until this Court's decision in 1942 in Hill v. TexasSearch
-
Thus, it cannot be said that Texas has systematically and completely excluded Negroes from the grand jury. Cf. Norris v. AlabamaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Akins v. TexasSearch
-
Tarrance v. FloridaSearch
-
Akens v. StateSearch
-
of Hill v. TexasSearch
-
Hamilton v. StateSearch
-
Cf. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
-
Court. Smith v. TexasSearch
-
Cf. Snowden v. HughesSearch
-
Pierson v. StateSearch
-
Hebert v. LouisianaSearch
-
Cf. Norris v. AlabamaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial