Citation network
In Re Summers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1945
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
we must for ourselves appraise the circumstances of the refusal. Nashville, C. & St.L. R. v. WallaceSearch
-
U. S. 249 , 288 U. S. 259 . Cf. Bridges v. CaliforniaSearch
-
First National Bank v. HartfordSearch
-
Osborn v. BankSearch
-
courts. A declaration on rights as they stand must be sought, not on rights which may arise in the future, Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
and there must be an actual controversy over an issue, not a desire for an abstract declaration of the law. Muskrat v. UnitedSearch
-
form of the proceeding is not significant. It is the nature and effect which is controlling. Nashville, C. & St.L. R. v. WallaceSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Clyde Wilson, Summers, Petitioner v. CommitteeSearch
-
to do nonwar work of national importance, this is by grace of Congressional recognition of their beliefs. Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
The United States does not admit to citizenship the alien who refuses to pledge military service. United States v. SchwimmerSearch
-
Cf. Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
Day, 181 Ill. 73, 82, 54 N.E. 646. Attorneys are officers of the court, answerable to it for their conduct. People v. PeoplesSearch
-
In Bradwell v. IllinoisSearch
-
Court under Article III of the Constitution, the case is of little, if any, value as a precedent on that point. Arant v. LaneSearch
-
United States v. MoreSearch
-
them for a refusal to serve as soldiers -- powers which this Court held the United States possesses in United States v. SchwimmerSearch
-
U. S. 644 , and United States v. MacintoshSearch
-
exalted a position in our country to be penalized on such an illusory basis. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
Nashville, C. & St.L. R. v. WallaceSearch
-
Cf. Bridges v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Muskrat v. UnitedSearch
-
Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
People v. PeoplesSearch
-
and United States v. MacintoshSearch
-
West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
Arant v. LaneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial