Citation network
Hill Vs. Florida
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1945
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 538 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court Hill v. FloridaSearch
-
U.S. 538 (1945) Hill v. FloridaSearch
-
regulations of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449. That Federal Act, we decided in Allen-Bradley Local v. WisconsinSearch
-
Napier v. AtlanticSearch
-
Cf. Labor Board v. HearstSearch
-
about a situation inconsistent with the federally protected process of collective bargaining. Cf. Western Union Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. KawSearch
-
St. Louis S.W. R. Co. v. ArkansasSearch
-
bargaining cannot be created consistently with the Federal Act. Nor can it be argued that our decision in Thomas v. CollinsSearch
-
The National Labor Relations Act applies only to activities which affect interstate commerce. Labor Board v. JonesSearch
-
regulating those matters which, not being themselves interstate commerce, nevertheless affect the commerce, California v. ThompsonSearch
-
Parker v. BrownSearch
-
s authority is curtailed only as Congress may by law prescribe in the exercise of the commerce power. United States v. DarbySearch
-
his functioning as a bargaining agent for employees under the National Labor Relations Act. Allen-Bradley Local v. WisconsinSearch
-
obstruct the exercise of rights conferred by the National Labor Relations Act or other federal legislation. Thomas v. CollinsSearch
-
as against others as well as the employer, to make an uninhibited choice of their bargaining agents. Cf. United States v. HutchesonSearch
-
it in no substantial way hinders or interferes with the performance of the union's functions under that Act. Thomas v. CollinsSearch
-
Smith v. IllinoisSearch
-
Western Distributing Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Dayton Power & Light Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Natural Gas Co. v. SlatterySearch
-
between the commerce clause or the federal statute and the local regulation which was found in Western Union Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
U. S. 530 , 125 U. S. 554 , and St. Louis S.W. R. Co. v. ArkansasSearch
-
expressed Page 325 U. S. 547 in the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act. Union Brokerage Company v. JensenSearch
-
power, even though it may affect such commerce, where the subject matter does not demand a nationwide rule. Willson v. BlackbirdSearch
-
Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
bearing upon that phase. In a great variety of cases, the Court has applied the accommodation formulated in Sinnot v. DavenportSearch
-
Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. HaberSearch
-
Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. HarrisSearch
-
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Atchison, T. & S.F. R. Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
may so circumscribe its regulation as to leave a part of the subject open to state action. Atlantic Coast Line v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U. S. 280 , 234 U. S. 290 . Cf. Napier v. AtlanticSearch
-
U. S. 605 . The purpose exclusively to regulate need not be specifically declared. New York Cent. R. Co. v. WinfieldSearch
-
Gilvary v. CuyahogaSearch
-
had to yield. Charleston & W.C. R. Co. v. VarnvilleSearch
-
ceased when State action ran counter to the specific requirements of the Hepburn Act, 34 Stat. 5 4. Southern R. Co. v. ReidSearch
-
Chicago, R.I. & P. R. Co. v. HardwickSearch
-
the hours of railroad employees could not survive a Congressional policy as to hours of service. Northern Pac. R. Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
cars with safety appliances superseded a State law dealing differently with such safety requirements. Southern R. Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
death or injury of its employees, a State could not assert a different basis of responsibility. New York Cent. R. Co. v. WinfieldSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial