Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Federation of Labor Vs. Mcadory

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 11, 1945

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 9 linked 49 unlinked
Show
  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co. Vs. Haworth US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1937
  2. Stearns Vs. Wood US Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1914
  3. District of Columbia Vs. Brooke US Supreme Court · May 17, 1909
  4. Anniston Mfg. Co. Vs. Davis US Supreme Court · May 17, 1937
  5. Watson Vs. Buck US Supreme Court · May 26, 1941
    Relied / Followed
  6. TurpIn Vs. Lemon US Supreme Court · Nov 03, 1902
  7. Labor Board Vs. Fainblatt US Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1939
  8. Townsend Vs. Yeomans US Supreme Court · May 24, 1937
  9. Marye Vs. Parsons US Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1885
  10. U.S. 450 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court Federation of Labor v. McAdory
    Search
  11. U.S. 450 (1945) Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdory
    Search
  12. are no less strict in a declaratory judgment proceeding than in any other type of suit. Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Wallace
    Search
  13. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific
    Search
  14. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Huffman
    Search
  15. Coffman v. Breeze
    Search
  16. United States v. Evans
    Search
  17. Muskrat v. United
    Search
  18. supra. It has long been its considered practice not to decide abstract, hypothetical or contingent questions, Giles v. Harris
    Search
  19. Electric Bond & Share Co. v. Securities
    Search
  20. United States v. Appalachian
    Search
  21. or to decide any constitutional question in advance of the necessity for its decision, Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors
    Search
  22. Liverpool, N.Y. & P. S.S. Co. v. Immigration
    Search
  23. Burton v. United
    Search
  24. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co. v. State
    Search
  25. law broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is to be applied, Liverpool, N.Y. & P. S.S. Co. v. Immigration
    Search
  26. White v. Johnson
    Search
  27. Allen-Bradley Local v. Board
    Search
  28. to decide any constitutional question except with reference to the particular facts to which it is to be applied, Hall v. Geiger-Jones
    Search
  29. Corporation Comm. v. Lowe
    Search
  30. Continental Baking Co. v. Page
    Search
  31. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Grosjean
    Search
  32. is constitutional as applied in one manner may, it is true, violate the Constitution when applied in another. Field v. Clark
    Search
  33. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant
    Search
  34. Concordia Fire Ins. Co. v. Illinois
    Search
  35. Associated Press v. Labor
    Search
  36. of justice will be advanced and an adequate and effective judgment may be rendered. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Huffman
    Search
  37. by it can draw in question its constitutional validity in a declaratory judgment proceeding as in any other. Marye v. Parsons
    Search
  38. Tyler v. Judges
    Search
  39. Arizona v. California
    Search
  40. First National Bank v. Louisiana
    Search
  41. Ashwander v. Tennessee
    Search
  42. Anderson Nat. Bank v. Luckett
    Search
  43. disputes would affect interstate commerce and are found to be such by the National Labor Relations Board. Labor Board v. Jones
    Search
  44. Polish Alliance v. Labor
    Search
  45. of any state of facts which would sustain the statute in whole or in part. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. v. Brownell
    Search
  46. United States v. Carolene
    Search
  47. Compare Hill v. Florida
    Search
  48. a state statute as in conflict with national legislation only if the conflict is clearly shown, Allen-Bradley Local v. Board
    Search
  49. application in any given case not now before us would or would not be constitutional. Liverpool, N.Y. & P. S.S. Co. v. Immigration
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court Federation of Labor v. McAdory
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial