Citation network
Bridges Vs. Wixon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 18, 1945
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 135 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court Bridges v. WixonSearch
-
U.S. 135 (1945) Bridges v. WixonSearch
-
past affiliation was insufficient for deportation, present membership or present affiliation being required. Kessler v. StreckerSearch
-
with the Communist party, and therefore could be deported, the court in United States v. ReimerSearch
-
that connection, it must be remembered that, although deportation technically is not criminal punishment ( Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
Mabler v. EbySearch
-
Ex parte Garland, 4 Wall. 333. As stated by Mr. Justice Brandeis speaking for the Court in Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
government by force and violence. Freedom of speech and of press is accorded aliens residing in this country. Bridges v. CaliforniaSearch
-
do not review the evidence beyond ascertaining that there is some evidence to support the deportation order. Vajtauer v. CommissionerSearch
-
order of deportation is established where an alien is ordered deported for reasons not specified by Congress. Mabler v. EbySearch
-
may be disregarded because they were not called to the attention of the inspector. It was assumed in Bilokumsky v. TodSearch
-
of impeachment. But they certainly would not be admissible in any criminal case as substantive evidence. Hickory v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BlockSearch
-
There has been some relaxation of the rule in alien exclusion cases. See United States ex rel. Ng Kee Wong v. CorsiSearch
-
the ordinary rules of evidence in administrative hearings. Yet, as was aptly stated in Interstate Commerce Co mission v. LouisvilleSearch
-
consider what the Attorney General might have ruled on the basis of the other evidence before him. Cf. United States v. DuntonSearch
-
proceedings, the alien does not prove he had an unfair hearing merely by proving the decision to be wrong ( Tisi v. TodSearch
-
U. S. 131 , 264 U. S. 133 ) or by showing that incompetent evidence was admitted and considered. Vajtauer v. CommissionerSearch
-
have been made. Then there is deportation without a fair hearing which may be corrected on habeas corpus. See Vajtauer v. CommissionerSearch
-
that where a prior statement of an alien, contradictory of testimony made at the hearing, is admitted. See Chan Wong v. NagleSearch
-
of the Alien Registration Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 673. This amendment set aside this Court's decision in Kessler v. StreckerSearch
-
him no constitutional rights, Congress may exclude him in the first instance for whatever reason it sees fit. Turner v. WilliamsSearch
-
right to free speech and free press, and that the Constitution will defend him in the exercise of that right. Bridges v. CaliforniaSearch
-
freedoms that the Constitution guarantees to resident aliens. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, in his dissenting opinion in Jones v. OpelikaSearch
-
of our jurisprudence. It partakes of the very essence of the concept of freedom and due process of law. Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
subscribe and of which he may not even be aware. This fact alone is enough to invalidate the legislation. Cf. DeJonge v. OregonSearch
-
test enunciated in Schenck v. UnitedSearch
-
not heretofore departed from that rule in reviewing deportation orders upon collateral attack by habeas corpus, Tisi v. TodSearch
-
Vajtauer v. CommissionerSearch
-
Page 326 U. S. 167 Costanzo v. TillinghastSearch
-
as it may constitutionally do. Zakonaite v. WolfSearch
-
the Attorney General has exceeded his statutory authority or acted contrary to law or the Constitution. Bilokumsky v. TodSearch
-
Bridges, failed to testify, and that Bridges' failure to call them as witnesses stands unexplained. Interstate Circuit v. UnitedSearch
-
in a criminal proceeding is irrelevant here, since a deportation proceeding is not a criminal proceeding. Bugajewitz v. PageSearch
-
Bilokumsky v. TodSearch
-
in trials in courts, particularly the hearsay rule, need not be followed in deportation proceedings, Bilokumsky v. TodSearch
-
Tisi v. TodSearch
-
of Immigration, supra, 273 U. S. 106 , more than in other administrative proceedings. Consolidated Edison Co. v. LaborSearch
-
Opp Cotton Mills v. AdministratorSearch
-
the evidence in such proceedings are not to its admissibility, but to its probative value. See Consolidated Edison Co. v. LaborSearch
-
Opp Cotton Mills v. AdministratorSearch
-
on its face, it is for the administrative officer to determine its credibility and weight. Merchants' Warehouse Co. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial