Citation network
Radio Station Wow, Inc. Vs. Johnson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 18, 1945
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 120 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. JohnsonSearch
-
U.S. 120 (1945) Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. JohnsonSearch
-
system not to permit an appeal until a litigation has been concluded in the court of first instance. See Heike v. UnitedSearch
-
Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
master or a lower State court of an account upon which a further decree is to be entered. See California National Bank v. StatelerSearch
-
it suffices to say that Forgay v. PageSearch
-
U. S. 126 Conrad, 6 How. 201, and Carondelet Canal Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
it is independent of, and unaffected by, another litigation with which it happens to be entangled. Compare Clark v. WilliardSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
raise other federal questions that may later come here, such as is true of eminent domain cases, see Grays Harbor Co. v. Coats-FordneySearch
-
Supreme Court directed immediate possession of the property to be transferred, the case comes squarely within Forgay v. ConradSearch
-
supra, and Carondelet Canal Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
that the case could have been brought here had the questions been raised prior to the original disposition. Simmerman v. NebraskaSearch
-
Godchaux Co. v. EstopinalSearch
-
Lynch v. NewSearch
-
of the nonfederal ground unless it is an obvious subterfuge to evade consideration of a federal issue. See Neilson v. LagowSearch
-
precludes its consideration on rehearing. These are matters of State law, and not our concern. Cf. Fair Haven R. Co. v. NewSearch
-
which it unambiguously rejected in its opinion it did not mean to assert through its judgment. Hotel Employees' Local v. BoardSearch
-
Burke v. UniqueSearch
-
opportunity to pass authoritatively on State issues involved in federal litigation. See, e.g., Spector Motor Service v. McLaughlinSearch
-
Most of the cases cited which involve an accounting have come from federal courts. In this category are Forgay v. ConradSearch
-
Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. MartinSearch
-
McGourkey v. ToledoSearch
-
Gulf Refining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
would be subjected to irremediable injury, for execution had been awarded. Also held final was the decree in Thomson v. DeanSearch
-
stock and an accounting to determine the amounts paid and to be paid and the dividends accrued. In Gulf Refining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
with immediate delivery of possession of the subject matter of the suit. This consideration was emphasized in Grant v. PhoenixSearch
-
Ins. Co., 106 U. S. 429 , 106 U. S. 431 -432, and in Collins v. MillerSearch
-
U. S. 364 , 252 U. S. 371 . Another line of cases starts with Winthrop Iron Co. v. MeekerSearch
-
had been prayed for in the bill. This unsubstantial distinction was seized upon in Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. MartinSearch
-
supra, and in McGourkey v. ToledoSearch
-
cases where an accounting had been sought. The cases from State courts are less numerous. California National Bank v. StatelerSearch
-
of money to be turned over remained to be ascertained, as did the existence of the stock. And, in Sand Springs Home v. NaharkeySearch
-
Opposed to the general observations in the Stateler case is the square ruling in Carondelet Canal Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. JohnsonSearch
-
See Heike v. UnitedSearch
-
See California National Bank v. StatelerSearch
-
Forgay v. PageSearch
-
and Carondelet Canal Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
Compare Clark v. WilliardSearch
-
Grays Harbor Co. v. Coats-FordneySearch
-
See Neilson v. LagowSearch
-
Cf. Fair Haven R. Co. v. NewSearch
-
Hotel Employees' Local v. BoardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial