Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

icc Vs. Parker

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 18, 1945

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 1 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Lowden US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1939
  2. U.S. 60 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court ICC v. Parker
    Search
  3. U.S. 60 (1945) Interstate Commerce Commission v. Parker
    Search
  4. Such use indicated a continuation of the administrative and judicial interpretation of the language. Cf. Case v. Los
    Search
  5. to determine public convenience and necessity. This Court approved this construction. Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. United
    Search
  6. States, 283 U. S. 35 , 283 U. S. 42 . Cf. Gray v. Powell
    Search
  7. authoritatively to decide whether additional motor service would serve public convenience and necessity. Cf. Powell v. United
    Search
  8. U. S. 287 . This, of course, gives administrative discretion to the Commission, cf. McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  9. the public interests in the different types of carriers with due regard to the declared purposes of Congress. Cf. ICC v. Inland
    Search
  10. United States v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  11. for such acquisitions appear now in Section 5 of the Interstate Commerce Act, 54 Stat. 905. See McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  12. whether to grant a railroad application for motor operation where these certificates are required. Cf. Texas v. United
    Search
  13. ICC v. Railway
    Search
  14. Taxas & N.O. R. Co. v. Northside
    Search
  15. such motor service on evidence of transportation advantages to shippers and economy to the rail carriers, cf. Texas v. United
    Search
  16. Together with No. 508, United States v. Parker
    Search
  17. Empire Carpet Corp. v. Boston
    Search
  18. b). See McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  19. business enterprises, are subject to the antitrust laws except as Congress has created exemptions for them. Georgia v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  20. of the public interest which the Commission is supposed to protect in the transportation field. McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court ICC v. Parker
    Search
  22. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Parker
    Search
  23. Cf. Case v. Los
    Search
  24. Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. United
    Search
  25. Cf. Gray v. Powell
    Search
  26. Cf. Powell v. United
    Search
  27. McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  28. of Congress. Cf. ICC v. Inland
    Search
  29. See McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  30. Cf. Texas v. United
    Search
  31. Texas v. United
    Search
  32. United States v. Parker
    Search
  33. Georgia v. Pennsylvania
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial