Citation network
Fpc Vs. Hope Nat. Gas Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 03, 1944
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
FPC v. HopeSearch
-
Nat. Gas Co. - 320 U.S. 591 (1944) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. HopeSearch
-
Nat. Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591 (1944) Federal Power Commission v. HopeSearch
-
theory as developed and applied in particular cases. P. 320 U. S. 605 . 7. United Railway Co. v. WestSearch
-
writs of certiorari which we granted because of the public importance of the questions presented. City of Cleveland v. HopeSearch
-
R.(N.S.), p. 9. In determining the amount of accrued depletion and depreciation, the Commission, following Lindheimer v. IllinoisSearch
-
Federal Power Commission v. NaturalSearch
-
U.S. p. 315 U. S. 582 . Ratemaking is indeed but one species of price-fixing. Munn v. IllinoisSearch
-
which is being regulated. But the fact that the value is reduced does not mean that the regulation is invalid. Block v. HirshSearch
-
Nebbia v. NewSearch
-
Page 320 U. S. 602 We held in Federal Power Commission v. NaturalSearch
-
it is the result reached, not the method employed, which is controlling. Cf. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. RailroadSearch
-
West Ohio Gas Co. v. PublicSearch
-
West v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
showing that it is invalid because it is unjust and unreasonable in its consequences. Cf. Railroad Commission v. CumberlandSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Lindheimer v. IllinoisSearch
-
Railroad Commission v. PacificSearch
-
costs of the business. These include service on the debt and dividends on the stock. Cf. Chicago & Grand Trunk R. Co. v. WellmanSearch
-
the enterprise, so as to maintain its credit and to attract capital. See Missouri ex rel. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Dayton Power & Light Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Utilities Commission, 292 U. S. 290 , 292 U. S. 312 . Cf. Lindheimer v. IllinoisSearch
-
of the supply is inevitable in the case of all natural gas companies. Moreover, this Court recognized in Lindheimer v. IllinoisSearch
-
We cannot approve the contrary holding Page 320 U. S. 607 of United Railways Co. v. WestSearch
-
has advanced here. And our conclusion is that Congress did not. We pointed out in Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. CentralSearch
-
the field in which such cases as Missouri v. PageSearch
-
U. S. 610 Kansas Natural Gas Co., 265 U. S. 298 , and Public Utilities Commission v. AttleboroSearch
-
and kindred statutory provisions. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Id., p. 307 U. S. 130 . And see United States v. LosSearch
-
Shannahan v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LosSearch
-
Together with No. 35, City of Cleveland v. HopeSearch
-
Id., 44 P.U.R.(N.S.), p. 40. And see Railroad Commission v. CumberlandSearch
-
Institutional Investors v. ChicagoSearch
-
See Mr. Justice Brandeis (dissenting) in United Railways & Electric Co. v. WestSearch
-
West Penn Power Co. v. BoardSearch
-
to the Act as requiring the inclusion of a depletion allowance among operating expenses. See Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Congressional acquiescence to date in the doctrine of Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
principle, and we wish to repeat that we have never acquiesced in it, and do not now. See Federal Power Commission v. NaturalSearch
-
standards of due process and for taking private property for public use without just compensation. Wilson v. NewSearch
-
statutory standards or had confiscated the property of the utility for public use. Cf. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
consumer by the time of the enactment Page 320 U. S. 622 of this Act. Cf. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. RailroadSearch
-
depart from the traditional concepts of fair value and earnings, it would have stated its intention plainly. Helvering v. GriffithsSearch
-
established earning power of a successful company and the probable cost of duplicating its services. Cf. A.T. & T. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the final say under the Constitution lies with the judiciary, and not the legislature. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Constitution may always be raised, Congressional acquiescence to date in the doctrine of Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
for judgment. It will little advance the public interest to substitute for the hodge-podge of the rule in Smyth v. AmesSearch
-
is irrelevant. That may be an appropriate attitude when state action is challenged as unconstitutional. Cf. Driscoll v. EdisonSearch
-
formula should be overruled as in conflict with Federal Power Commission v. NaturalSearch
-
I am able to discover, proposed its application to a natural gas case. On the other hand, dissenting in Pennsylvania v. WestSearch
-
simply transferred the rate base method to the natural gas industry. It happened in Newark Natural Gas & Fuel Co. v. CitySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial