Citation network
Brown Vs. Gerdes
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 07, 1944
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 178 (1944) U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. GerdesSearch
-
U.S. 178 (1944) Brown v. GerdesSearch
-
to enforce and collect certain claims which the debtor had against its former officers and directors. See Gerdes v. ReynoldsSearch
-
the establishment of more effective control over reorganization fees and expenses ( Dickinson Industrial Site, Inc. v. CowanSearch
-
Callaghan v. ReconstructionSearch
-
resources of the estate may have on both the fairness and feasibility of the plan of reorganization. United States v. ChicagoSearch
-
and provided a centralized control over all administration expenses, of which lawyers' fees are a part. Watkins v. SedberrySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Woods v. CitySearch
-
contains special appeal provisions governing orders granting or denying allowances. Dickinson Industrial Site, Inc. v. CowanSearch
-
and confirm the plan on another basis or delegate the task to another court or agency. See Case v. LosSearch
-
which Congress has conferred on the bankruptcy Page 321 U. S. 184 court is paramount and exclusive. Gross v. IrvingSearch
-
and their counsel who were appointed by the state court and who rendered service in the state proceedings. Gross v. IrvingSearch
-
U. S. 515 , 318 U. S. 519 . Sherman v. BuckleySearch
-
of the district courts rests on consent of the parties, regardless of diversity of citizenship. Schumacher v. BeelerSearch
-
court for the prosecution of a claim is, of course, bound by the adjudication made in the state proceeding. Winchester v. HeiskellSearch
-
Fischer v. PaulineSearch
-
the performance of functions which Congress has entrusted to the bankruptcy court. See Eau Claire National Bank v. JackmanSearch
-
did not discriminate against those asserting rights under the federal act, such condition would be valid. Cf. Douglas v. NewSearch
-
that New York might have refused to entertain such suits as were brought against the old management ( cf. Mondou v. NewSearch
-
it could take jurisdiction of them but fail to apply any federal law in which those claims might be rooted. Garrett v. Moore-McCormackSearch
-
which Congress has imposed on the bankruptcy court could be absorbed by the state tribunal. Eau Claire National Bank v. JackmanSearch
-
has been entrusted to the bankruptcy court exclusively. The case is therefore controlled by the principle of Hines v. LowreySearch
-
See Continental Illinois Nat. Bank v. ChicagoSearch
-
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. BankersSearch
-
suggested by the Court in Gross v. IrvingSearch
-
them to enforce rights no matter what the legislative source of the right may be. See, for instance, United States v. JonesSearch
-
Anglo-American Provision Co. v. DavisSearch
-
Murnan v. WabashSearch
-
of the State creating the court, and without the power of Congress. See, for instance, Minneapolis & St. Louis R. v. BombolisSearch
-
U. S. 211 . As it was put by Mr. Justice Story in Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Employers' Liability Act, and, after thorough canvass, the matter was thus summarized by Mr. Justice Holmes in Douglas v. NewSearch
-
by the Constitution, such as those guaranteed by the Full Faith and Credit Clause, see Anglo-American Provision Co. v. DavisSearch
-
or with reference to the power exercised by Congress under the Commerce Clause, see Minneapolis & St. Louis R. v. BombolisSearch
-
X, both of which must be inescapable before we even reach the constitutional issue needlessly projected. 7. Hines v. LowreySearch
-
in New York courts in the enforcement of federal rights shall not be subject to New York's fee system. I repeat, Hines v. LowreySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. GerdesSearch
-
See Gerdes v. ReynoldsSearch
-
See Case v. LosSearch
-
Gross v. IrvingSearch
-
Sherman v. BuckleySearch
-
See Eau Claire National Bank v. JackmanSearch
-
Cf. Douglas v. NewSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial