Citation network
Bowles Vs. Willingham
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 27, 1944
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 503 (1944) U.S. Supreme Court Bowles v. WillinghamSearch
-
U.S. 503 (1944) Bowles v. WillinghamSearch
-
rents for housing accommodations in defense rental areas, Congress did not delegate its legislative power. Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
any orders in the state proceedings. The District Court, 51 F.Supp. 597, in reliance on its earlier ruling in Payne v. GriffinSearch
-
and the exceptions which have been engrafted on it. Toucey v. NewSearch
-
As Page 321 U. S. 511 we recently held in Lockerty v. PhilipsSearch
-
which is designed to avoid collisions between state and federal authorities ( Toucey v. NewSearch
-
they should exercise that jurisdiction concurrently with the courts of the States. Plaquemines Tropical Fruit Co. v. HendersonSearch
-
The Moses Taylor, 4 Wall. 411, 71 U. S. 428 -430. And see Tennessee v. DavisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
raises issues related to those considered in Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
c). The considerations which support the delegation of authority under this Act over commodity prices ( Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
Those steps constitute the performance of the legislative function in the constitutional sense. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. AdministratorSearch
-
not more vague than the standards governing the determination by the Secretary of Agriculture in United States v. RockSearch
-
the standards which its administrative agency is to apply raises large issues of policy. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
a). We fail to see how more Page 321 U. S. 516 could be required ( Taylor v. BrownSearch
-
the exact rentals which Mrs. Willingham might exact. As we have pointed out and as more fully developed in Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
Act will be applied and the weight to be accorded various statutory criteria on given facts. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. AdministratorSearch
-
Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
of authority is concerned, the rent control provisions of the Act, like the price control provisions ( Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
control of rents in the District of Columbia provided machinery for securing to a landlord a reasonable rental. Block v. HirshSearch
-
U. S. 135 , 256 U. S. 157 . And see Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. SiegelSearch
-
rates which are just and reasonable in their application to particular persons or companies. Federal Power Commission v. HopeSearch
-
to fix rents, landlord by landlord, as in the fashion of utility rates, would have been quite impossible. Wilson v. BrownSearch
-
Such considerations of feasibility and practicality are certainly germane to the constitutional issue. Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySearch
-
of property. Wilson v. BrownSearch
-
does not mean that the regulation is unconstitutional. Mr. Justice Holmes, speaking for the Court, stated in Block v. HirshSearch
-
in value as a consequence of regulation. But that has never been a barrier to the exercise of the police power. L'Hote v. NewSearch
-
Hebe Co. v. ShawSearch
-
Pierce Oil Corp. v. CitySearch
-
Hamilton v. KentuckySearch
-
Euclid v. AmblerSearch
-
in this regard by the Fifth Amendment are no greater than those imposed on the States by the Fourteenth. Hamilton v. KentuckySearch
-
U. S. 100 , 657. It is implicit in cases such as Nebbia v. NewSearch
-
which involved the power of New York to fix the minimum and maximum prices of milk, and Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
valid, was improper because it was on a class, rather than an individual, basis. Indeed, the decision in Munn v. IllinoisSearch
-
legislation. Congress was dealing here with conditions created by activities resulting from a great war effort. Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
as it did for the District of Columbia. See 55 Stat. 788. We agree with the Emergency Court of Appeals ( Avant v. BowlesSearch
-
need not make that requirement when it delegates the task to an administrative agency. In Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. StateSearch
-
review comes after the order has been promulgated, and no provision for a stay is made. But as we have held in Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
review satisfies the requirements of due process. As stated by Mr. Justice Brandeis for a unanimous Court in Phillips v. CommissionerSearch
-
of due process if the opportunity given for the ultimate judicial determination of the liability is adequate. Springer v. UnitedSearch
-
Scottish Union & National Ins. Co. v. BowlandSearch
-
Language in the cases that due process requires a hearing before the administrative order becomes effective ( Morgan v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bowles v. WillinghamSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial