Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Walling Vs. Reuter Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 10, 1944

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

50 entries 3 linked 47 unlinked
Show
  1. Leonard and Leonard Vs. Earle US Supreme Court · May 13, 1929
  2. Heitmuller Vs. Stokes US Supreme Court · May 16, 1921
  3. Brownlow Vs. Schwartz US Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1923
  4. Walling v. Reuter
    Search
  5. Co. - 321 U.S. 671 (1944) U.S. Supreme Court Walling v. Reuter
    Search
  6. Co., 321 U.S. 671 (1944) Walling v. Reuter
    Search
  7. of James v. Reuter
    Search
  8. dissolved without any prolongation of its life for the purpose of continuing pending litigation against it, see McCoy v. State
    Search
  9. Page 321 U. S. 674 or has abated merely because of the dissolution of the corporate defendant. See United States v. Trans-Missouri
    Search
  10. Southern Pac. Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  11. Southern Pac. Terminal Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  12. corporation, its agents and officers and those individuals associated with it in the conduct of its business, Wilson v. United
    Search
  13. vitality of the judgment in such a case survives the dissolution of the corporate defendant. Southport Petroleum Co. v. Labor
    Search
  14. Board, 315 U. S. 100 , 315 U. S. 106 -107. And see, to like effect, Labor Board v. Hopwood
    Search
  15. Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Western
    Search
  16. Morton v. Superior
    Search
  17. Katenkamp v. Superior
    Search
  18. Mayor v. New
    Search
  19. Farmers Fertilizer Co. v. Ruh
    Search
  20. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. McKelvey
    Search
  21. Alemite Mfg. Corp. v. Staff
    Search
  22. Labor Board v. Colten
    Search
  23. Union Drawn Steel Co. v. Labor
    Search
  24. Page 321 U. S. 675 petitioner represents, than if only private interests were involved. See Virginian Ry. Co. v. System
    Search
  25. as party respondent. Page 321 U. S. 676 Such is the effect of dissolution under the Louisiana law. See McCoy v. State
    Search
  26. Ortego v. Nehi
    Search
  27. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  28. from, this Court may vacate the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings. Missouri ex rel. Wabash R. Co. v. Public
    Search
  29. Patterson v. Alabama
    Search
  30. Villa v. Van
    Search
  31. the cause in order to enable the court below to enter a new judgment from which a proper appeal may be taken. Gully v. Interstate
    Search
  32. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  33. Jameson & Co. v. Morgenthau
    Search
  34. Phillips v. United
    Search
  35. may not consider its merits, but may make such disposition of the whole case as justice may require. United States v. Hamburg-American
    Search
  36. U.S. Supreme Court Walling v. Reuter
    Search
  37. of James v. Reuter
    Search
  38. McCoy v. State
    Search
  39. See United States v. Trans-Missouri
    Search
  40. Southern Pac. Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  41. Wilson v. United
    Search
  42. Southport Petroleum Co. v. Labor
    Search
  43. Labor Board v. Hopwood
    Search
  44. Alemite Mfg. Corp. v. Staff
    Search
  45. See Virginian Ry. Co. v. System
    Search
  46. See McCoy v. State
    Search
  47. Wabash R. Co. v. Public
    Search
  48. Gully v. Interstate
    Search
  49. United States v. Hamburg-American
    Search
  50. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial