Citation network
Huddleston Vs. Dwyer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 15, 1944
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 232 (1944) U.S. Supreme Court Huddleston v. DwyerSearch
-
U.S. 232 (1944) Huddleston v. DwyerSearch
-
then to entertain jurisdiction in an ancillary proceeding in mandamus to compel the necessary tax levies. Dwyer v. LeFloreSearch
-
Court, 137 F.2d 383, after an examination of the Oklahoma authorities, including Independent School District No. 39 v. ExchangeSearch
-
Wichita v. BoardSearch
-
Board of Education v. JohnstonSearch
-
Okl. 172, 115 P.2d 132, and Wilson v. CitySearch
-
brought to the attention of the court and relied upon an opinion of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Wilson v. CitySearch
-
its conclusions announced in the Wilson case. In particular, it declared that Independent School District No. 39 v. ExchangeSearch
-
National Co., supra, and First National Bank in Wichita v. BoardSearch
-
rule of decision in this case as to both substantive and procedural rights of the parties. Erie Railroad Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
well as the trial court, to ascertain and apply the state law where, as in this case, it controls decision. Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
Vandenbark v. Owens-IllinoisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
considered and decided by the state or federal court from which the case is brought to this Court for review. Dorchy v. KansasSearch
-
Wabash Ry. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Ruhlin v. NewSearch
-
cases, the considered determination of questions of state law by the intermediate federal appellate courts, cf. Ruhlin v. NewSearch
-
they may conveniently first be decided by the court whose judgment we are called upon to review. See, e.g., Ruhlin v. NewSearch
-
Rosenthal v. NewSearch
-
West v. A.TSearch
-
Klaxon Co. v. StentorSearch
-
Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Huddleston v. DwyerSearch
-
Dwyer v. LeFloreSearch
-
Wichita v. BoardSearch
-
and Wilson v. CitySearch
-
Wilson v. CitySearch
-
Wabash Ry. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Whitman v. WilsonSearch
-
Dorchy v. KansasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial