Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. White

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 12, 1944

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 3 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Mcalister Vs. Henkel US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  2. Hale Vs. Henkel US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  3. United States Vs. Laudani US Supreme Court · Jan 03, 1944
  4. U.S. 694 (1944) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. White
    Search
  5. U.S. 694 (1944) United States v. White
    Search
  6. is a purely personal one, it cannot be utilized by or on behalf of any organization, such as a corporation. Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  7. Wilson v. United
    Search
  8. Essgee Co. v. United
    Search
  9. States, 262 U. S. 151 . See also United States v. Invader
    Search
  10. property of the person claiming the privilege, or at least in his possession in a purely personal capacity. Boyd v. United
    Search
  11. against self-incrimination, even though production of the papers might tend to incriminate them personally. Wilson v. United
    Search
  12. Dreier v. United
    Search
  13. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  14. Wheeler v. United
    Search
  15. Grant v. United
    Search
  16. right may be enforced on appropriate Page 322 U. S. 700 occasions by available legal procedures. See Guthrie v. Harkness
    Search
  17. impersonal records and documents, effective enforcement of many federal and state laws would be impossible. See Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  18. provides a convenient vehicle for justification of governmental investigation of corporate books and records. Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  19. as such unless it is shown that they personally authorized or participated in the particular acts. See Lawlor v. Page
    Search
  20. Eagle Glass & Mfg. Co. v. Rowe
    Search
  21. U. S. 275 . Moreover, this Court in United Mine Workers v. Coronado
    Search
  22. have granted many substantive rights to labor unions as separate functioning institutions. In United Mine Workers v. Coronado
    Search
  23. or to produce documents. Hence, respondent could not rely upon any possible privilege that the union might have. Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  24. Act, which was before us in United States v. Laudani
    Search
  25. See Nye v. United
    Search
  26. In United Mine Workers v. Coronado
    Search
  27. a similar recognition. See, in general, 1 & 2 Teller, Labor Disputes and Collective Bargaining (1940), Part V. For
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. White
    Search
  29. United States v. Invader
    Search
  30. Boyd v. United
    Search
  31. See Guthrie v. Harkness
    Search
  32. See Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  33. See Lawlor v. Page
    Search
  34. United Mine Workers v. Coronado
    Search
  35. Part v. For
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales