Citation network
Sec Vs. Chenery Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 01, 1943
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
SEC v. ChenerySearch
-
Corp. - 318 U.S. 80 (1943) U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. ChenerySearch
-
Corp., 318 U.S. 80 (1943) Securities and Exchange Commission v. ChenerySearch
-
of trust. We reject a lax view of fiduciary obligations, and insist upon their scrupulous observance. See Wormley v. WormleySearch
-
by analogy the restrictions imposed on trustees in trafficking in property held by them in trust for others, Michoud v. GirodSearch
-
namely, Pepper v. LittonSearch
-
Magruder v. DrurySearch
-
and Meinhard v. SalmonSearch
-
principles of law and equity which, in themselves, are sufficient to sustain its order. The only question in Pepper v. LittonSearch
-
U.S. at 308 U. S. 296 . Another case relied upon, Woods v. CitySearch
-
Act, 52 Stat. 840, could deny compensation to protective committees representing conflicting interests. Michoud v. GirodSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
How. 503, and Magruder v. DrurySearch
-
Act of 1935 was designed to correct. See the concurring opinion of Judge Learned Hand in Morgan, Stanley & Co. v. SecuritiesSearch
-
safeguard for the interests protected by the Act. There must be such a responsible finding. Compare United States v. ChicagoSearch
-
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
Ibid. Compare United States v. CarolinaSearch
-
should have recognized the influence of admonitory language like the following it approvingly quoted from Meinhard v. SalmonSearch
-
able to make so substantial a contribution to the development of the administrative law of this field. See e.g. Pepper v. LittonSearch
-
Phelps-Dodge Corporation v. LaborSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. ChenerySearch
-
Securities and Exchange Commission v. ChenerySearch
-
See Wormley v. WormleySearch
-
Woods v. CitySearch
-
and Magruder v. DrurySearch
-
Morgan, Stanley & Co. v. SecuritiesSearch
-
Compare United States v. ChicagoSearch
-
Meinhard v. SalmonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial