Citation network
Johnson Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 15, 1943
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 318 U.S. 189 (1943) U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 318 U.S. 189 (1943) Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
The case of an accused who voluntarily takes the stand and the case of an accused who refrains from testifying ( Bruno v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 308 U. S. 287 ) are, of course, vastly different. Raffel v. UnitedSearch
-
Fitzpatrick v. UnitedSearch
-
Powers v. UnitedSearch
-
not run afoul of the rule which prohibits inquiry into a collateral crime unconnected with the offense charged. Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
line of inquiry therefore satisfied the test of relevancy, and was a proper part of cross-examination. See Cravens v. UnitedSearch
-
Mehan v. UnitedSearch
-
Weiss v. UnitedSearch
-
Bullock v. StateSearch
-
numbers income in 1938 could properly be the subject of comment and inference. As stated by this Court in Caminetti v. UnitedSearch
-
of privilege could not properly be denied. The rule which obtains when the accused fails to take the stand ( Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
Phelin v. KenderdineSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Wireman v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Ky. 57, 62, 63, 261 S.W. 862. And see State v. VromanSearch
-
Carne v. LitchfieldSearch
-
People v. McGungillSearch
-
We are mindful of the fact that there is eminent authority which may be said to represent the contrary view. State v. OberSearch
-
See United States v. AtkinsonSearch
-
Clyatt v. UnitedSearch
-
here with inadvertence or oversight. This is a case where silent approval of the course followed by the court ( Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
the claim of privilege was treated. In such a situation, the rule stated by Mr. Justice Sutherland in United States v. MantonSearch
-
United States v. MantonSearch
-
of the cross-examination on his 1938 income deprived him of his right to be present during the trial. Cf. Snyder v. MassachusettsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Bruno v. UnitedSearch
-
Raffel v. UnitedSearch
-
Fitzpatrick v. UnitedSearch
-
Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
See Cravens v. UnitedSearch
-
Caminetti v. UnitedSearch
-
Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
State v. VromanSearch
-
State v. OberSearch
-
Cf. Snyder v. MassachusettsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial