Citation network
Board of County Comm'rs Vs. Seber
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 19, 1943
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 705 (1943) U.S. Supreme Court Board of County Comm'rs v. SeberSearch
-
U.S. 705 (1943) Board of County Commissioners v. SeberSearch
-
Helm v. BelvinSearch
-
Riley v. CollierSearch
-
Waldon v. BakerSearch
-
to the contrary. Even if the 1937 Act were ambiguous, we think this interpretation should be taken. Cf. United States v. ReilySearch
-
place as independent, qualified members of the modern body politic. This was classically summarized in United States v. KagamaSearch
-
of time, subject to extension -- denials which were sustained as proper exercises of Congressional power. Tiger v. WesternSearch
-
Sunderland v. UnitedSearch
-
States to protect and preserve those restricted allotted lands for the Indian owners has been recognized, Heckman v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
instrumentalities by which the United States provided for the welfare and education of its Indian wards. United States v. RickertSearch
-
that proceeds from the sale or lease of restricted allotted lands are immune from state taxation. See United States v. ThurstonSearch
-
National Bank of Commerce v. AndersonSearch
-
Shaw v. Gibson-ZahniserSearch
-
of a state or one of its subdivisions, is for the consideration of Congress, not the courts. Cf. Federal Land Bank v. BismarckSearch
-
with their status as wards whose property is subject to the plenary control of the federal government. See Tiger v. WesternSearch
-
In Sunderland v. UnitedSearch
-
such restrictions upon lands purchased with restricted funds from leases of restricted allotted lands ( see Shaw v. Gibson-ZahniserSearch
-
Oil Corp., 276 U. S. 575 , and United States v. BrownSearch
-
F.2d 564, at 568), and to make those restrictions run with the lands in the hands of Indian grantees. Cf. Drummond v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. GoldfederSearch
-
See Shaw v. OilSearch
-
date, January 1, in each year although taxes are levied as of July 1. See Board of Commissioners of Comanche County v. CentralSearch
-
See United States v. KagamaSearch
-
Choctaw Nation v. UnitedSearch
-
Stephens v. CherokeeSearch
-
Tiger v. WesternSearch
-
Board of Comm'rs v. UnitedSearch
-
than a restricted fee. The power of Congress over both types of allotments, however, is the same. See United States v. RamseySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Board of County Comm'rs v. SeberSearch
-
Board of County Commissioners v. SeberSearch
-
Cf. United States v. ReilySearch
-
Heckman v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. ThurstonSearch
-
Cf. Federal Land Bank v. BismarckSearch
-
See Tiger v. WesternSearch
-
and United States v. BrownSearch
-
Cf. Drummond v. UnitedSearch
-
See Board of Commissioners of Comanche County v. CentralSearch
-
See United States v. RamseySearch
-
United States v. RamseySearch
-
United States v. SandovalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial