Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mcleod Vs. Threlkeld

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 07, 1943

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

50 entries 2 linked 48 unlinked
Show
  1. Kirschbaum Co. Vs. Walling US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1942
  2. Warren-bradshaw Drilling Co. Vs. Hall US Supreme Court · Nov 09, 1942
  3. U.S. 491 (1943) U.S. Supreme Court McLeod v. Threlkeld
    Search
  4. U.S. 491 (1943) McLeod v. Threlkeld
    Search
  5. Sections 6 and 7. See the discussion and reference to legislative history in Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling
    Search
  6. U. S. 517 , and Walling v. Jacksonville
    Search
  7. Walling v. Jacksonville
    Search
  8. Overstreet v. North
    Search
  9. concept of interstate commerce which can be applied to every federal statute regulating commerce. See Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling
    Search
  10. choice of language was well known to Congress. Cf. National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 448, 450. Labor Board v. Jones
    Search
  11. to feed workers engaged in the production of goods for commerce have been held to be similarly engaged. Hanson v. Lagerstrom
    Search
  12. Consolidated Timber Co. v. Womack
    Search
  13. Higgins v. Carr
    Search
  14. significance. If the work is in interstate commerce, the exemption does not apply. Compare Consolidated Timber Co. v. Womack
    Search
  15. Hanson v. Lagerstrom
    Search
  16. Philadelphia, B. & W.R. Co. v. Smith
    Search
  17. Shanks v. Del
    Search
  18. Chicago & North Western Ry. Co. v. Bolle
    Search
  19. Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. Co. v. Commission
    Search
  20. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co. v. Bezue
    Search
  21. Pedersen v. Delaware
    Search
  22. Overstreet v. North
    Search
  23. Overnight Motor Transp. Co. v. Missel
    Search
  24. U. S. 129 -130, 318 U. S. 132 . This practical test was derived from cases such as Pedersen v. Delaware
    Search
  25. L. & W. R. Co., 229 U. S. 146 , 229 U. S. 151 , and Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co. v. Smith
    Search
  26. such as the janitor and the shop tender, and probably petitioner, would be within the Act. Cf. Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling
    Search
  27. tests for determining the scope of the two phrases of coverage in substantially similar language. In Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling
    Search
  28. U.S. at 316 U. S. 525 -526. Correspondingly, in Overstreet v. North
    Search
  29. in the production of goods for commerce which Congress considered injurious to interstate commerce. See United States v. Darby
    Search
  30. course, depends upon the character of the employees' activities, not the nature of the employer's business. Overstreet v. North
    Search
  31. Shanks v. Delaware
    Search
  32. See Chicago & North Western Ry. Co. v. Bolle
    Search
  33. Overnight Motor Co. v. Missel
    Search
  34. b)(1) of the Act. See Southland Gasoline Co. v. Bayley
    Search
  35. Cf. Shanks v. Delaware
    Search
  36. Cf. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. Bolle
    Search
  37. Cf. Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. Co. v. Commission
    Search
  38. Cf. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co. v. Bezue
    Search
  39. of goods for commerce have been held to be similarly engaged and covered by the Act. Consolidated Timber Co. v. Womack
    Search
  40. U.S. Supreme Court McLeod v. Threlkeld
    Search
  41. and Walling v. Jacksonville
    Search
  42. See Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling
    Search
  43. Labor Board v. Jones
    Search
  44. Compare Consolidated Timber Co. v. Womack
    Search
  45. and Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co. v. Smith
    Search
  46. the Act. Cf. Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling
    Search
  47. In Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling
    Search
  48. See United States v. Darby
    Search
  49. of the Act. See Southland Gasoline Co. v. Bayley
    Search
  50. the Act. Consolidated Timber Co. v. Womack
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial