Citation network
Meredith Vs. Winter Haven
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 08, 1943
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
Haven - 320 U.S. 228 (1943) U.S. Supreme Court Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
Haven, 320 U.S. 228 (1943) Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
that the applicable law of Florida was not clearly settled and stable, but was quite the contrary, citing Sullivan v. CitySearch
-
Commissioners of Columbia County v. KingSearch
-
Nuveen v. GreerSearch
-
Humphreys v. StateSearch
-
Alta-Cliff Co. v. SpurwaySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Lee v. Bond-HowellSearch
-
Lumber Co., 123 Fla. 202, 166 So. 733, and Andrews v. CitySearch
-
of state law, the case does not differ from an ordinary equity suit in which, both before and since Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
Outman v. ConeSearch
-
Outman v. PageSearch
-
Taylor v. WilliamsSearch
-
Andrews v. CitySearch
-
amended bill of complaint, after the present suit was begun, the Supreme Court of Florida decided the case of Andrews v. CitySearch
-
It is the contention of petitioners that the Andrews case is not controlling, because it, as well as Outman v. ConeSearch
-
supra, and Taylor v. WilliamsSearch
-
with earlier decisions of the Supreme Court of Florida antedating the Refunding Bonds of 1933, particularly Sullivan v. CitySearch
-
State v. CitySearch
-
State v. SpecialSearch
-
Bay County v. StateSearch
-
State v. CitrusSearch
-
State v. SarasotaSearch
-
Court of Florida was not directed to the doctrine which it had earlier announced in Commissioners of Columbia County v. KingSearch
-
supra, and in State ex rel. Nuveen v. GreerSearch
-
be said with some assurance that the Florida Supreme Court will not follow them in the future, see Wichita Royalty Co. v. CitySearch
-
West v. AmericanSearch
-
invoked, to decide questions of state law whenever necessary to the rendition of a judgment. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. BradfordSearch
-
Risty v. ChicagoSearch
-
Kline v. BurkeSearch
-
federal district courts is an appeal to the sound discretion which guides the determinations of courts of equity. Beal v. MissouriSearch
-
powers may require them to withhold their relief in furtherance of a recognized defined public policy. Di Giovanni v. CamdenSearch
-
to interfere with state criminal prosecutions except when moved by most urgent considerations, Spielman Motor Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
Beal v. MissouriSearch
-
Douglas v. CitySearch
-
or with the collection of state taxes or with the fiscal affairs of the state, Matthews v. RodgersSearch
-
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSearch
-
the state administrative function of prescribing the local rates of public utilities, Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
there is no contention that the interests of creditors and stockholders will not be adequately protected, Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSearch
-
Kelleam v. MarylandSearch
-
refuse to appraise or shape domestic policy of the state governing its administrative agencies. Railroad Commission v. RowanSearch
-
Burford v. SunSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial