Citation network
Jones Vs. Opelika
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 08, 1942
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 584 (1942) U.S. Supreme Court Jones v. OpelikaSearch
-
U.S. 584 (1942) Jones v. OpelikaSearch
-
as to him by a provision purporting to empower the licensing authority to revoke licenses without notice. Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
the, Supreme Court of Arkansas held the ordinance constitutional on the authority of its previous decision in Cook v. HarrisonSearch
-
this Court denies any place to administrative censorship of ideas or capricious approval of distributors. In Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
in Schneider v. StateSearch
-
said Mr. Justice Cardozo, concurring in Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
be contended that the publication of newspapers is not subject to the usual governmental fiscal exactions, Giragi v. MooreSearch
-
Ariz. 74, 64 P.2d 819, or the obligations placed by statutes on other business. Associated Press v. LaborSearch
-
escape control by the simple expedient of printing matter of public interest on the same sheet or handbill. Valentine v. ChrestensenSearch
-
power of municipalities must yield when Page 316 U. S. 598 abridgement is shown. Compare Grosjean v. AmericanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Press Co., 297 U. S. 233 , with Giragi v. MooreSearch
-
is authorized. No religious symbolism is involved such as was urged against the flag salute in Minersville District v. GobitisSearch
-
in amount, from those selling books or papers, which abridges the freedoms of worship, speech or press. Cf. Grosjean v. AmericanSearch
-
to city may in time bulk large, he will have enjoyed a correlatively enlarged field of distribution. Cf. Coverdale v. Arkansas-LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 612 -613. The First Amendment does not require a subsidy in the form of fiscal exemption. Giragi v. MooreSearch
-
charge against which petitioner claimed the protection of the Constitution. This issue he had standing to raise. Smith v. CahoonSearch
-
to pass on the validity of the revocation section, as it does not affect his present defense. Highland Farms Dairy v. AgnewSearch
-
Lehon v. CitySearch
-
of Atlanta, 242 U. S. 53 , 242 U. S. 56 . In Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
hazard of such revocation is much too contingent for us now to declare the licensing provisions to be invalid. Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
Cf. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. WatsonSearch
-
New York v. KleinertSearch
-
Dewey v. DesSearch
-
Moines, 173 U. S. 193 , and Clark v. PaulSearch
-
Chaplinsky v. NewSearch
-
Minersville District v. GobitisSearch
-
Hague v. CIOSearch
-
De Jonge v. OregonSearch
-
Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
Gitlow v. NewSearch
-
Cox v. NewSearch
-
Home Bldg. & L. Assn. v. BlaisdellSearch
-
Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Schneider v. StateSearch
-
Cf. Hague v. CIOSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Jones v. OpelikaSearch
-
Cook v. HarrisonSearch
-
In Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
Giragi v. MooreSearch
-
Associated Press v. LaborSearch
-
Compare Grosjean v. AmericanSearch
-
Cf. Grosjean v. AmericanSearch
-
Cf. Coverdale v. Arkansas-LouisianaSearch
-
Smith v. CahoonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial