Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wickard Vs. Filburn

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 09, 1942

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

56 entries 10 linked 46 unlinked
Show
  1. Kirschbaum Co. Vs. Walling US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1942
  2. Veazie Vs. Moor US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1852
  3. Kidd Vs. Pearson US Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1888
  4. Hammer Vs. Dagenhart US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1918
  5. United States Vs. Patten US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1913
  6. United Leather Workers Vs. Herkert US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1924
  7. Di Santo Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · Jan 03, 1927
  8. Stafford Vs. Wallace US Supreme Court · May 01, 1922
  9. Gray Vs. Powell US Supreme Court · Dec 01, 1941
  10. Apex Hosiery Co. Vs. Leader US Supreme Court · May 27, 1940
  11. U.S. 111 (1942) U.S. Supreme Court Wickard v. Filburn
    Search
  12. U.S. 111 (1942) Wickard v. Filburn
    Search
  13. on this speech, is frivolous, and the injunction, insofar as it rests on this ground, is unwarranted. United States v. Rock
    Search
  14. this instance sought to exercise. The question would merit little consideration, since our decision in United States v. Darby
    Search
  15. beginning, Chief Justice Marshall described the federal commerce power with a breadth never yet exceeded. Gibbons v. Ogden
    Search
  16. pronouncements, and allowed but Page 317 U. S. 122 little scope to the power of Congress. United States v. Knight
    Search
  17. the earlier ones, and to bring about a return to the principles first enunciated by Chief Justice Marshall in Gibbons v. Ogden
    Search
  18. supra. Not long after the decision of United States v. Knight
    Search
  19. Swift & Co. v. United
    Search
  20. United States v. Wrightwood
    Search
  21. here, his contribution, taken together with that of many others similarly situated, is far from trivial. Labor Board v. Fairblatt
    Search
  22. asks, he would be better off than this law allows. To deny him this is not to deny him due process of law. Cf. Mulford v. Smith
    Search
  23. Gray v. Powell
    Search
  24. Cloverleaf Co. v. Patterson
    Search
  25. Overnight Transportation Co. v. Missel
    Search
  26. the opinion of the Court in Carter v. Carter
    Search
  27. Hopkins v. United
    Search
  28. Anderson v. United
    Search
  29. Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton
    Search
  30. Schechter Corp. v. United
    Search
  31. Carter v. Carter
    Search
  32. Heisler v. Thomas
    Search
  33. Oliver Iron Co. v. Lord
    Search
  34. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Pfost
    Search
  35. Northern Securities Co. v. United
    Search
  36. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  37. Southern Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  38. Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader
    Search
  39. Standard Oil Co. v. United
    Search
  40. In Santa Cruz Co. v. Labor
    Search
  41. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Goodrich
    Search
  42. Cf. Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte
    Search
  43. Chicago Board of Trade v. Olsen
    Search
  44. Coronado Coal Co. v. United
    Search
  45. United States v. Trenton
    Search
  46. U.S. Supreme Court Wickard v. Filburn
    Search
  47. United States v. Rock
    Search
  48. of Congress. United States v. Knight
    Search
  49. of United States v. Knight
    Search
  50. Labor Board v. Fairblatt
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial