Citation network
Davis Vs. Department of Labor and Industries
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 14, 1942
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Davis v. DepartmentSearch
-
of Labor and Industries - 317 U.S. 249 (1942) U.S. Supreme Court Davis v. DepartmentSearch
-
of Labor and Industries, 317 U.S. 249 (1942) Davis v. DepartmentSearch
-
A line of opinions of this Court beginning with Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
Stat. 395. May 17, 1920, this Court declared the Act unconstitutional. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSearch
-
Baizley Iron Works v. SpanSearch
-
by the statute of limitations in the proper forum while he was erroneously pursuing it elsewhere. See e.g., Ayers v. ParkerSearch
-
facts, fall on either side. Overruling the Jensen case would not solve this problem. In our decision in Parker v. MotorSearch
-
in cases of apparent error. It was under these circumstances that we sustained the Commissioner's findings in Parker v. MotorSearch
-
heavily on the presumption of constitutionality in favor of the state statute. South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
Alaska Packers' Assn. v. IndustrialSearch
-
Accident Commission, 294 U. S. 532 , 294 U. S. 547 . And see Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. IndustrialSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Sultan Railway & Timber Co. v. DeptSearch
-
Grant Smith-Porter Co. v. RohdeSearch
-
Millers' Indemnity Underwriters Co. v. BraudSearch
-
Ex parte Rosengrant, 213 Ala. 202, 104 So. 409, aff'd, Rosengrant v. HavardSearch
-
State Industrial Board of N.Y. v. TerrySearch
-
Tench Co., Inc., 273 U.S. 639, reported as Lahti v. TerrySearch
-
Accident Commission, 276 U. S. 467 . And note the dissenting view in Baizley Iron Works v. SpanSearch
-
United States Casualty Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McManigalSearch
-
Gonsalves v. MorseSearch
-
Nogivera v. NewSearch
-
Northern Coal Co. v. StrandSearch
-
Employers' Assurance Corp. v. CookSearch
-
For a number of state cases supporting each position, see the Circuit Court opinion in Motor Boat Sales v. ParkerSearch
-
accidents affecting persons standing on either the vessel or the wharf who are knocked into the water. Smith & Son v. TaylorSearch
-
Vancouver S.S. Co. v. RiceSearch
-
Minnie v. PortSearch
-
See, for other examples of our application of this principle, Southern R. Co. v. KingSearch
-
Interstate Busses Corp. v. HolyokeSearch
-
Railway Exp. Agency v. VirginiaSearch
-
c. 97, 40 Stat. 395, as amended by the Act of June 10, 1922, c. 216, 42 Stat. 634. But Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
long as the employee in a situation like the present is permitted to recover either under the Federal act ( cf. Parker v. MotorSearch
-
Nogueira v. NewSearch
-
Employers' Liability Assurance Co. v. CookSearch
-
U. S. 233 ) or under a state statute. Cf. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. BraudSearch
-
In Parker v. MotorSearch
-
erroneously concluded they were without constitutional power to make the award. Indeed, after our decision in Parker v. MotorSearch
-
rule would seem to compel reversal of a federal commissioner who declined jurisdiction. See Northern Coal Co. v. StrandSearch
-
U. S. 142 , and Employers' Liability Assurance Co. v. CookSearch
-
See Nogueira v. NewSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Davis v. DepartmentSearch
-
Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSearch
-
Ayers v. ParkerSearch
-
Parker v. MotorSearch
-
South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial