Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Garrett Vs. Moore-mccormack Co, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 14, 1942

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

64 entries 14 linked 50 unlinked
Show
  1. Panama R. Co. Vs. Johnson US Supreme Court · Apr 07, 1924
  2. Cities Service Oil Co. Vs. Dunlap US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1939
  3. Engel Vs. Davenport US Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1926
  4. Just Vs. Chambers US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1941
  5. Carlisle Packing Co. Vs. Sandanger US Supreme Court · May 29, 1922
  6. Western Fuel Co. Vs. Garcia US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1921
  7. Michoud Vs. Girod US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1846
  8. Chesapeake and Ohio Ry. Co. Vs. Howard US Supreme Court · May 21, 1900
  9. Texas and Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Dashiell US Supreme Court · May 29, 1905
  10. Beadle Vs. Spencer US Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1936
  11. Warner Vs. Goltra US Supreme Court · Nov 05, 1934
  12. Leon Vs. Galceran US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1870
  13. Standard Oil Co. Vs. Johnson US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1942
  14. Union Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Harris US Supreme Court · May 20, 1895
  15. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack
    Search
  16. Co, Inc. - 317 U.S. 239 (1942) U.S. Supreme Court Garrett v. Moore-McCormack
    Search
  17. Co, Inc., 317 U.S. 239 (1942) Garrett v. Moore-McCormack
    Search
  18. Act, and the state courts are required to apply this rule in Jones Page 317 U. S. 244 Act actions. Beadle v. Spencer
    Search
  19. Socony-Vacuum Co. v. Smith
    Search
  20. This uniformity requirement extends to the type of proof necessary for judgment. New Orleans & Northeastern R. Co. v. Harris
    Search
  21. Belden v. Page
    Search
  22. Harden v. Gordon
    Search
  23. Harmon v. United
    Search
  24. be liberally construed to carry out its full purpose, which was to enlarge admiralty's protection to its wards. Warner v. Goltra
    Search
  25. law, rights fashioned by it are to be implemented by admiralty rules not inconsistent with the Act. Socony Vacuum Co. v. Smith
    Search
  26. the very substance of his claim, and cannot be considered a mere incident of a form of procedure. Central Vermont R. v. White
    Search
  27. of negligence arises under the law of admiralty. These rights are independent and cumulative. Pacific S.S. Co. v. Peterson
    Search
  28. Cortes v. Baltimore
    Search
  29. Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor
    Search
  30. Leon v. Galceran
    Search
  31. Panama Railroad v. Vasquez
    Search
  32. Colonna Shipyard v. Bland
    Search
  33. Paulsen v. McDuffie
    Search
  34. Lieflander v. States
    Search
  35. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Eastern
    Search
  36. Port of New York Stevedoring Corp. v. Castagna
    Search
  37. Southern Pac. Co. v. Jensen
    Search
  38. Chelentis v. Luckenbach
    Search
  39. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart
    Search
  40. Messel v. Foundation
    Search
  41. Co., 274 U. S. 427 , 274 U. S. 434 , and see Schuede v. Zenith
    Search
  42. Detroit Trust Co. v. Barlum
    Search
  43. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  44. See Claflin v. Houseman
    Search
  45. Standard Oil Co. v. Johnson
    Search
  46. See Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Lucas
    Search
  47. Magruder v. Drury
    Search
  48. Thorn Wire Hedge Co. v. Washburn
    Search
  49. Klamath Indians v. United
    Search
  50. States, 296 U. S. 244 , 296 U. S. 254 , and United States v. Dunn
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial